CockshuttModel A
Cockshutt 1355
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 190 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Cockshutt 1355 vs Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star 2
Image not recorded
Minneapolis-MolineModel B
Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star 2
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 206 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 10
CockshuttCockshutt 1355
vs
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline Jet Star 2
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ Jet Star 2 higher · +16 ci (+8%)1355190 ci
Jet Star 2206 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1355 is in the 51st percentile; Jet Star 2 is in the 57th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied13554
Jet Star 24
Median Utility Tractor4
1355 is in the 50th percentile; Jet Star 2 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Jet Star 2 higher · +2 (+25%)13558
Jet Star 210
Median Utility Tractor12
1355 is in the 23rd percentile; Jet Star 2 is in the 39th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ Jet Star 2 higher · +190 lb (+4%)13554,410 lb
Jet Star 24,600 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1355 is in the 42nd percentile; Jet Star 2 is in the 44th · 5,107 models
1355 (A)Jet Star 2 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cockshutt 1355 | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star 2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cockshutt | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | 1355 | Jet Star 2 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Cockshutt 1355 | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star 2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | 8045 | 3.4L 4-cyl | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 190ci | 206ci | ▲ Jet Star 2+16 ci · +8% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.6in | ▲ 1355+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 5in | ▲ Jet Star 2+0.7 in · +16% |
Transmission
| Spec | Cockshutt 1355 | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star 2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Partial Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cockshutt 1355 | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star 2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 70in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 60.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 4,410lb | 4,600lb | ▲ Jet Star 2+190 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cockshutt 1355 | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star 2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Cockshutt 1355 | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star 2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | 6in | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tread | 14.9in | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cockshutt 1355 | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star 2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/I | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cockshutt 1355 | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star 2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cockshutt 1355 | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star 2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Cockshutt 1355 | Minneapolis-Moline Jet Star 2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 51st percentile (190 ci)B · 57th percentile (206 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 39th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 42nd percentile (4,410 lb)B · 44th percentile (4,600 lb)
A · 1355B · Jet Star 2Median Utility Tractor