Image not recorded
CockshuttModel A
Cockshutt 1465
Utility
- power
- 77 hp
- displacement
- 278 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 7
Head to head · Utility
Cockshutt 1465 vs Cockshutt 40
Image not recorded
CockshuttModel B
Cockshutt 40
Row Crop
- power
- 40.2 hp
- displacement
- 230 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 6
CockshuttCockshutt 1465
vs
CockshuttCockshutt 40
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 1465 higher · +36.8 hp (+92%)146577 hp
4040.2 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1465 is in the 69th percentile; 40 is in the 34th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1465 higher · +48 ci (+21%)1465278 ci
40230 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1465 is in the 82nd percentile; 40 is in the 62nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 40 higher · +2 (+50%)14654
406
Median Utility Tractor4
1465 is in the 50th percentile; 40 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1465 higher · +1 (+17%)14657
406
Median Utility Tractor12
1465 is in the 15th percentile; 40 is in the 11th · 4,941 models
1465 (A)40 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cockshutt 1465 | Cockshutt 40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cockshutt | Cockshutt | Same |
| Model | 1465 | 40 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Cockshutt 1465 | Cockshutt 40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | Buda | — |
| Model | OM C03/70 | 3.8L 6-cyl | — |
| Power Output | 77hp | 40.2hp | ▲ 1465+36.8 hp · +92% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,658RPM | ▲ 1465+442 RPM · +27% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 40+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 278ci | 230ci | ▲ 1465+48 ci · +21% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 3.4in | ▲ 1465+0.9 in · +26% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 4.1in | ▲ 1465+0.6 in · +15% |
Transmission
| Spec | Cockshutt 1465 | Cockshutt 40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cockshutt 1465 | Cockshutt 40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 140in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 68.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,700lb | 5,305lb | ▲ 1465+1,395 lb · +26% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cockshutt 1465 | Cockshutt 40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cockshutt 1465 | Cockshutt 40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I/II | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cockshutt 1465 | Cockshutt 40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cockshutt 1465 | Cockshutt 40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 69th percentile (77 hp)B · 34th percentile (40.2 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 82nd percentile (278 ci)B · 62nd percentile (230 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 15th percentile (7)B · 11th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 64th percentile (6,700 lb)B · 50th percentile (5,305 lb)
A · 1465B · 40Median Utility Tractor