Head to head · Row Crop

Cockshutt 1550 vs Ford Commander 6000

Image not recorded
CockshuttModel A

Cockshutt 1550

Row Crop

power
Not recorded
displacement
232 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
12
Full 1550 specs
Image not recorded
FordModel B

Ford Commander 6000

Row Crop

power
Not recorded
displacement
242 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
10
Full Commander 6000 specs
CockshuttCockshutt 1550
vs
FordFord Commander 6000

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 806–1,417

Engine Displacement

▲ Commander 6000 higher · +10 ci (+4%)
1550232 ci
Commander 6000242 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

1550 is in the 13th percentile; Commander 6000 is in the 14th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
15506
Commander 60006
Median Row Crop Tractor6

1550 is in the 50th percentile; Commander 6000 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

▲ 1550 higher · +2 (+20%)
155012
Commander 600010
Median Row Crop Tractor16

1550 is in the 27th percentile; Commander 6000 is in the 22nd · 1,200 models

Operating Weight

▲ Commander 6000 higher · +130 lb (+2%)
15507,000 lb
Commander 60007,130 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb

1550 is in the 16th percentile; Commander 6000 is in the 16th · 1,350 models

1550 (A)Commander 6000 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCockshutt 1550Ford Commander 6000Difference
ManufacturerCockshuttFord—
Model1550Commander 6000—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCockshutt 1550Ford Commander 6000Difference
ManufacturerOliverFord—
Model3.8L 6-cylNot recorded—
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,430RPM▲ Commander 6000+230 RPM · +10%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement232ci242ci▲ Commander 6000+10 ci · +4%
Bore3.6in3.6inSame
Stroke3.8in3.9in▲ Commander 6000+0.1 in · +3%

Transmission

SpecCockshutt 1550Ford Commander 6000Difference
TypePartial power shiftFull power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCockshutt 1550Ford Commander 6000Difference
Length155in142in▲ 1550+13 in · +9%
Width81.5in71.5in▲ 1550+10 in · +14%
Height97.6in78.2in▲ 1550+19.4 in · +25%
Operating Weight7,000lb7,130lb▲ Commander 6000+130 lb · +2%

Hydraulics

SpecCockshutt 1550Ford Commander 6000Difference
Steering TypePower assistPower—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecCockshutt 1550Ford Commander 6000Difference
TypeNot recordedIndependent—
Speed 1Not recorded540rpm—
Speed 2Not recorded1,000rpm—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCockshutt 1550Ford Commander 6000Difference
Hitch CategoryII/III/ISame
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecCockshutt 1550Ford Commander 6000Difference
Chassis Type4x2 2WD4x2 2WDSame
Drive Type2WD2WDSame
Steering TypePower assistPower—
Brake TypeNot recordedDifferential hydraulic wet disc—

Electrical

SpecCockshutt 1550Ford Commander 6000Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecCockshutt 1550Ford Commander 6000Difference
Coolant5gal3.9gal▲ 1550+1.1 gal · +28%

Operator Station

SpecCockshutt 1550Ford Commander 6000Difference
TypeNot recordedOpen operator station—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 13th percentile (232 ci)B · 14th percentile (242 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 27th percentile (12)B · 22nd percentile (10)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 16th percentile (7,000 lb)B · 16th percentile (7,130 lb)

Length

median 180 in
A · 20th percentile (155 in)B · 13th percentile (142 in)
A · 1550B · Commander 6000Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCockshutt 1550Full spec pageFord Commander 6000