Image not recorded
CockshuttModel A
Cockshutt 1550
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 232 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Row Crop
Cockshutt 1550 vs Valmet 985
ValmetModel B
Valmet 985
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 239 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
CockshuttCockshutt 1550
vs
ValmetValmet 985
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ 985 higher · +7 ci (+3%)1550232 ci
985239 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
1550 is in the 13th percentile; 985 is in the 14th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ 1550 higher · +2 (+50%)15506
9854
Median Row Crop Tractor6
1550 is in the 50th percentile; 985 is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1550 higher · +4 (+50%)155012
9858
Median Row Crop Tractor16
1550 is in the 27th percentile; 985 is in the 16th · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ 985 higher · +340 lb (+5%)15507,000 lb
9857,340 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
1550 is in the 16th percentile; 985 is in the 17th · 1,350 models
1550 (A)985 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cockshutt 1550 | Valmet 985 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cockshutt | Valmet | — |
| Model | 1550 | 985 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Cockshutt 1550 | Valmet 985 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Oliver | MWM | — |
| Model | 3.8L 6-cyl | TD229 | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ 985+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 1550+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 232ci | 239ci | ▲ 985+7 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 3.6in | 4in | ▲ 985+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 3.8in | 4.7in | ▲ 985+0.9 in · +24% |
Transmission
| Spec | Cockshutt 1550 | Valmet 985 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial power shift | Synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cockshutt 1550 | Valmet 985 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 155in | 176in | ▲ 985+21 in · +14% |
| Width | 81.5in | 82.7in | ▲ 985+1.2 in · +1% |
| Height | 97.6in | 104in | ▲ 985+6.4 in · +7% |
| Operating Weight | 7,000lb | 7,340lb | ▲ 985+340 lb · +5% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cockshutt 1550 | Valmet 985 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cockshutt 1550 | Valmet 985 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Type II | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cockshutt 1550 | Valmet 985 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cockshutt 1550 | Valmet 985 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Cockshutt 1550 | Valmet 985 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5gal | 3.2gal | ▲ 1550+1.8 gal · +56% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Cockshutt 1550 | Valmet 985 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 13th percentile (232 ci)B · 14th percentile (239 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 27th percentile (12)B · 16th percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 16th percentile (7,000 lb)B · 17th percentile (7,340 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 20th percentile (155 in)B · 44th percentile (176 in)
A · 1550B · 985Median Row Crop Tractor