CockshuttModel A
Cockshutt 1555
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 232 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Row Crop
Cockshutt 1555 vs Kubota M96S
Image not recorded
KubotaModel B
Kubota M96S
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 230 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
CockshuttCockshutt 1555
vs
KubotaKubota M96S
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ 1555 higher · +2 ci (<1%)1555232 ci
M96S230 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
1555 is in the 13th percentile; M96S is in the 12th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ 1555 higher · +2 (+50%)15556
M96S4
Median Row Crop Tractor6
1555 is in the 50th percentile; M96S is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ M96S higher · +4 (+33%)155512
M96S16
Median Row Crop Tractor16
1555 is in the 27th percentile; M96S is in the 50th · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1555 higher · +580 lb (+9%)15556,841 lb
M96S6,261 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
1555 is in the 15th percentile; M96S is in the 13th · 1,350 models
1555 (A)M96S (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cockshutt 1555 | Kubota M96S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cockshutt | Kubota | — |
| Model | 1555 | M96S | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Cockshutt 1555 | Kubota M96S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha-Oliver | Kubota | — |
| Model | 3.8L 6-cyl diesel | V3800-DI-T | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ M96S+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 1555+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 232ci | 230ci | ▲ 1555+2 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.8in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Cockshutt 1555 | Kubota M96S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydra-Power, Partial power shift, Unsynchronized gear | Partially synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cockshutt 1555 | Kubota M96S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 155in | 163in | ▲ M96S+8 in · +5% |
| Width | 81.5in | 91in | ▲ M96S+9.5 in · +12% |
| Height | 97.6in | 104in | ▲ M96S+6.4 in · +7% |
| Operating Weight | 6,841lb | 6,261lb | ▲ 1555+580 lb · +9% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cockshutt 1555 | Kubota M96S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Cockshutt 1555 | Kubota M96S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 10.00-16 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 18.4-30 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cockshutt 1555 | Kubota M96S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cockshutt 1555 | Kubota M96S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cockshutt 1555 | Kubota M96S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Cockshutt 1555 | Kubota M96S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5gal | 2.4gal | ▲ 1555+2.6 gal · +108% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Cockshutt 1555 | Kubota M96S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS or Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 13th percentile (232 ci)B · 12th percentile (230 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 27th percentile (12)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 15th percentile (6,841 lb)B · 13th percentile (6,261 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 20th percentile (155 in)B · 27th percentile (163 in)
A · 1555B · M96SMedian Row Crop Tractor