Image not recorded
CockshuttModel A
Cockshutt 1650
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 283 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Row Crop
Cockshutt 1650 vs Zetor 10111
Image not recorded
ZetorModel B
Zetor 10111
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 278 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
CockshuttCockshutt 1650
vs
ZetorZetor 10111
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ 1650 higher · +5 ci (+2%)1650283 ci
10111278 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
1650 is in the 28th percentile; 10111 is in the 27th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ 1650 higher · +2 (+50%)16506
101114
Median Row Crop Tractor6
1650 is in the 50th percentile; 10111 is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 10111 higher · +10 (+167%)16506
1011116
Median Row Crop Tractor16
1650 is in the 11th percentile; 10111 is in the 50th · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ 10111 higher · +960 lb (+12%)16507,815 lb
101118,775 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
1650 is in the 19th percentile; 10111 is in the 25th · 1,350 models
1650 (A)10111 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cockshutt 1650 | Zetor 10111 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cockshutt | Zetor | — |
| Model | 1650 | 10111 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Cockshutt 1650 | Zetor 10111 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha-Oliver | Zetor | — |
| Model | 4.6L 6-cyl diesel | 8002.1 | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 1650+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 283ci | 278ci | ▲ 1650+5 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.3in | ▲ 10111+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 4in | 4.7in | ▲ 10111+0.7 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Cockshutt 1650 | Zetor 10111 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 6-speed unsynchronized | Two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cockshutt 1650 | Zetor 10111 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 155in | 157in | ▲ 10111+2 in · +1% |
| Width | 81.5in | 76.8in | ▲ 1650+4.7 in · +6% |
| Height | 80in | 104in | ▲ 10111+24 in · +30% |
| Operating Weight | 7,815lb | 8,775lb | ▲ 10111+960 lb · +12% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cockshutt 1650 | Zetor 10111 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cockshutt 1650 | Zetor 10111 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/I | II | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cockshutt 1650 | Zetor 10111 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Manual External Compression Band | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cockshutt 1650 | Zetor 10111 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Cockshutt 1650 | Zetor 10111 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5gal | 4.8gal | ▲ 1650+0.2 gal · +4% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 28th percentile (283 ci)B · 27th percentile (278 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 11th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 19th percentile (7,815 lb)B · 25th percentile (8,775 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 20th percentile (155 in)B · 21st percentile (157 in)
A · 1650B · 10111Median Row Crop Tractor