Image not recorded
CockshuttModel A
Cockshutt 1755
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 310 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Row Crop
Cockshutt 1755 vs Zetor 10245
ZetorModel B
Zetor 10245
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 278 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
CockshuttCockshutt 1755
vs
ZetorZetor 10245
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ 1755 higher · +32 ci (+12%)1755310 ci
10245278 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
1755 is in the 33rd percentile; 10245 is in the 27th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ 1755 higher · +2 (+50%)17556
102454
Median Row Crop Tractor6
1755 is in the 50th percentile; 10245 is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 10245 higher · +10 (+167%)17556
1024516
Median Row Crop Tractor16
1755 is in the 11th percentile; 10245 is in the 50th · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1755 higher · +100 lb (+1%)17559,600 lb
102459,500 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
1755 is in the 29th percentile; 10245 is in the 28th · 1,350 models
1755 (A)10245 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cockshutt 1755 | Zetor 10245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cockshutt | Zetor | — |
| Model | 1755 | 10245 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Cockshutt 1755 | Zetor 10245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha-Oliver | Zetor | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 1755+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 1755+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 310ci | 278ci | ▲ 1755+32 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.3in | ▲ 10245+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 4.7in | ▲ 10245+0.3 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | Cockshutt 1755 | Zetor 10245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Synchromesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cockshutt 1755 | Zetor 10245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 160in | 157in | ▲ 1755+3 in · +2% |
| Width | 80.6in | 76.8in | ▲ 1755+3.8 in · +5% |
| Height | 85.5in | 113in | ▲ 10245+27.5 in · +32% |
| Operating Weight | 9,600lb | 9,500lb | ▲ 1755+100 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cockshutt 1755 | Zetor 10245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Cockshutt 1755 | Zetor 10245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 7.5-15 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 18.4-34 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cockshutt 1755 | Zetor 10245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type II | — |
| Hitch Category | I/II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cockshutt 1755 | Zetor 10245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Cockshutt 1755 | Zetor 10245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Cockshutt 1755 | Zetor 10245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5gal | 4.8gal | ▲ 1755+0.2 gal · +4% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Cockshutt 1755 | Zetor 10245 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 33rd percentile (310 ci)B · 27th percentile (278 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 11th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 29th percentile (9,600 lb)B · 28th percentile (9,500 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 24th percentile (160 in)B · 21st percentile (157 in)
A · 1755B · 10245Median Row Crop Tractor