Head to head · Standard Tread

Cockshutt 35 vs Ebro Super 55

Image not recorded
CockshuttModel A

Cockshutt 35

Standard Tread

power
Not recorded
displacement
198 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
6
Full 35 specs
Ebro Super 55 Tractor
EbroModel B

Ebro Super 55

Agricultural

power
Not recorded
displacement
220 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
6
Full Super 55 specs
CockshuttCockshutt 35
vs
EbroEbro Super 55

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Standard Tread

n = 341367

Engine Displacement

▲ Super 55 higher · +22 ci (+11%)
35198 ci
Super 55220 ci
Median Standard Tread Tractor382 ci

35 is in the 11th percentile; Super 55 is in the 16th · 353 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
354
Super 554
Median Standard Tread Tractor4

35 is in the 50th percentile; Super 55 is in the 50th · 367 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
356
Super 556
Median Standard Tread Tractor4

35 is in the 79th percentile; Super 55 is in the 79th · 341 models

35 (A)Super 55 (B)Median Standard Tread Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCockshutt 35Ebro Super 55Difference
ManufacturerCockshuttEbro
Model35Super 55
CategoryStandard TreadAgricultural

Engine

SpecCockshutt 35Ebro Super 55Difference
ManufacturerHerculesNot recorded
ModelGO198Not recorded
Cylinders44Same
Displacement198ci220ciSuper 55+22 ci · +11%

Transmission

SpecCockshutt 35Ebro Super 55Difference
TypeGearManual

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Displacement

median 382 ci
A · 11th percentile (198 ci)B · 16th percentile (220 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)

Forward Gears

median 4
A · 79th percentile (6)B · 79th percentile (6)
A · 35B · Super 55Median Standard Tread Tractor
Full spec pageCockshutt 35Full spec pageEbro Super 55