CockshuttModel A
Cockshutt 50
Standard Tread
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 273 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Standard Tread
Cockshutt 50 vs Massey Ferguson 390
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 390
Utility
- power
- 67.3 hp
- displacement
- 248 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
CockshuttCockshutt 50
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 390
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Standard Tread
Engine Displacement
▲ 50 higher · +25 ci (+10%)50273 ci
390248 ci
Median Standard Tread Tractor382 ci
50 is in the 26th percentile; 390 is in the 21st · 353 models
Cylinders
▲ 50 higher · +2 (+50%)506
3904
Median Standard Tread Tractor4
50 is in the 93rd percentile; 390 is in the 50th · 367 models
Forward Gears
▲ 390 higher · +6 (+100%)506
39012
Median Standard Tread Tractor4
50 is in the 79th percentile; 390 is in the 97th · 341 models
Operating Weight
▲ 390 higher · +559 lb (+9%)506,041 lb
3906,600 lb
Median Standard Tread Tractor6,834 lb
50 is in the 38th percentile; 390 is in the 46th · 297 models
50 (A)390 (B)Median Standard Tread Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cockshutt 50 | Massey Ferguson 390 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cockshutt | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 50 | 390 | — |
| Category | Standard Tread | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Cockshutt 50 | Massey Ferguson 390 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Buda | Perkins | — |
| Model | 4.5L 6-cyl | A4.248 | — |
| Power Output | Not recorded | 67.3hp | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,650RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 390+550 RPM · +33% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 50+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 273ci | 248ci | ▲ 50+25 ci · +10% |
| Bore | 3.8in | 4in | ▲ 390+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.1in | 5in | ▲ 390+0.9 in · +22% |
Transmission
| Spec | Cockshutt 50 | Massey Ferguson 390 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | unsynchronized gear | Synchromesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cockshutt 50 | Massey Ferguson 390 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 132in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 77.7in | — |
| Height | 79.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,041lb | 6,600lb | ▲ 390+559 lb · +9% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cockshutt 50 | Massey Ferguson 390 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 5.9gpm | 8.2gpm | ▲ 390+2.3 gpm · +39% |
| Pressure | 1,675psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Cockshutt 50 | Massey Ferguson 390 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Tires
| Spec | Cockshutt 50 | Massey Ferguson 390 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cockshutt 50 | Massey Ferguson 390 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cockshutt 50 | Massey Ferguson 390 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Multiple wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cockshutt 50 | Massey Ferguson 390 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Cockshutt 50 | Massey Ferguson 390 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 4gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 382 ciA · 26th percentile (273 ci)B · 21st percentile (248 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 4A · 79th percentile (6)B · 97th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 6,834 lbA · 38th percentile (6,041 lb)B · 46th percentile (6,600 lb)
A · 50B · 390Median Standard Tread Tractor