Head to head · Agricultural

Cockshutt Golden Arrow vs Hinomoto N279

Image not recorded
CockshuttModel A

Cockshutt Golden Arrow

Agricultural

power
Not recorded
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
6
Full Golden Arrow specs
Image not recorded
HinomotoModel B

Hinomoto N279

Agricultural

power
Not recorded
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full N279 specs
CockshuttCockshutt Golden Arrow
vs
HinomotoHinomoto N279

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 1,130–1,130

Cylinders

▲ Golden Arrow higher · +1 (+33%)
Golden Arrow4
N2793
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

Golden Arrow is in the 31st percentile; N279 is in the 8th · 1,130 models

Golden Arrow (A)N279 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCockshutt Golden ArrowHinomoto N279Difference
ManufacturerCockshuttHinomoto—
ModelGolden ArrowN279—
CategoryAgriculturalAgriculturalSame

Engine

SpecCockshutt Golden ArrowHinomoto N279Difference
ManufacturerHerculesToyosha—
ModelGO198Not recorded—
Cylinders43▲ Golden Arrow+1 · +33%

Transmission

SpecCockshutt Golden ArrowHinomoto N279Difference
TypeGearNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCockshutt Golden ArrowHinomoto N279Difference
Hitch CategoryNot recordedCategory 3—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCockshutt Golden ArrowHinomoto N279Difference
Chassis TypeNot recorded4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive TypeNot recorded4WD—

Category context

Both models against the field

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 31st percentile (4)B · 8th percentile (3)
A · Golden ArrowB · N279Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageCockshutt Golden ArrowFull spec pageHinomoto N279