Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
County 754 vs Massey Ferguson 2607H
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 2607H
Utility
- power
- 74 hp
- displacement
- 158 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
CountyCounty 754
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 2607H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied75474 hp
2607H74 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
754 is in the 66th percentile; 2607H is in the 66th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 754 higher · +98 ci (+62%)754256 ci
2607H158 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
754 is in the 73rd percentile; 2607H is in the 42nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 754 higher · +1 (+33%)7544
2607H3
Median Utility Tractor4
754 is in the 50th percentile; 2607H is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied7548
2607H8
Median Utility Tractor12
754 is in the 23rd percentile; 2607H is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
754 (A)2607H (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | County 754 | Massey Ferguson 2607H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | County | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 754 | 2607H | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | County 754 | Massey Ferguson 2607H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Simpson | — |
| Model | 256 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 74hp | 74hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ 754+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 754+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 256ci | 158ci | ▲ 754+98 ci · +62% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 3.7in | ▲ 754+0.7 in · +19% |
| Stroke | 4.2in | 5in | ▲ 2607H+0.8 in · +19% |
Transmission
| Spec | County 754 | Massey Ferguson 2607H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Sync shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | County 754 | Massey Ferguson 2607H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 146in | 138in | ▲ 754+8 in · +6% |
| Width | Not recorded | 72.9in | — |
| Height | 68in | 94.5in | ▲ 2607H+26.5 in · +39% |
| Operating Weight | 11,800lb | 5,269lb | ▲ 754+6,531 lb · +124% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | County 754 | Massey Ferguson 2607H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | County 754 | Massey Ferguson 2607H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | County 754 | Massey Ferguson 2607H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | County 754 | Massey Ferguson 2607H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | County 754 | Massey Ferguson 2607H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 66th percentile (74 hp)B · 66th percentile (74 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 73rd percentile (256 ci)B · 42nd percentile (158 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 90th percentile (11,800 lb)B · 50th percentile (5,269 lb)
A · 754B · 2607HMedian Utility Tractor