Cub CadetModel A
Cub Cadet 5264
Utility
- power
- 26 hp
- displacement
- 58.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Cub Cadet 5264 vs Cub Cadet 7275
Cub CadetModel B
Cub Cadet 7275
Utility
- power
- 27 hp
- displacement
- 91.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Cub CadetCub Cadet 5264
vs
Cub CadetCub Cadet 7275
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 7275 higher · +1 hp (+4%)526426 hp
727527 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5264 is in the 18th percentile; 7275 is in the 19th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 7275 higher · +33.2 ci (+57%)526458.1 ci
727591.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5264 is in the 5th percentile; 7275 is in the 17th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied52643
72753
Median Utility Tractor4
5264 is in the 23rd percentile; 7275 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 7275 higher · +1,335 lb (+99%)52641,350 lb
72752,685 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
5264 is in the 4th percentile; 7275 is in the 19th · 5,107 models
5264 (A)7275 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cub Cadet 5264 | Cub Cadet 7275 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cub Cadet | Cub Cadet | Same |
| Model | 5264 | 7275 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Cub Cadet 5264 | Cub Cadet 7275 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daihatsu | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | Not recorded | K3M | — |
| Power Output | 26hp | 27hp | ▲ 7275+1 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 3,600RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 5264+1,100 RPM · +44% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 58.1ci | 91.3ci | ▲ 7275+33.2 ci · +57% |
| Bore | 2.8in | 3.3in | ▲ 7275+0.5 in · +18% |
| Stroke | 3.1in | 3.5in | ▲ 7275+0.4 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | Cub Cadet 5264 | Cub Cadet 7275 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cub Cadet 5264 | Cub Cadet 7275 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 85in | 115in | ▲ 7275+30 in · +35% |
| Width | 45in | 54in | ▲ 7275+9 in · +20% |
| Height | 51in | 84.3in | ▲ 7275+33.3 in · +65% |
| Operating Weight | 1,350lb | 2,685lb | ▲ 7275+1,335 lb · +99% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cub Cadet 5264 | Cub Cadet 7275 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cub Cadet 5264 | Cub Cadet 7275 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type I | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cub Cadet 5264 | Cub Cadet 7275 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Cub Cadet 5264 | Cub Cadet 7275 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Cub Cadet 5264 | Cub Cadet 7275 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.3gal | 1.7gal | ▲ 7275+0.4 gal · +31% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Cub Cadet 5264 | Cub Cadet 7275 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | With ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 18th percentile (26 hp)B · 19th percentile (27 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 5th percentile (58.1 ci)B · 17th percentile (91.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 4th percentile (1,350 lb)B · 19th percentile (2,685 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 3rd percentile (85 in)B · 20th percentile (115 in)
A · 5264B · 7275Median Utility Tractor