Image not recorded
Cub CadetModel A
Cub Cadet 7000
Sub-Compact
- power
- 20 hp
- displacement
- 68.6 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Cub Cadet 7000 vs New Holland Boomer 1020
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland Boomer 1020
Utility
- power
- 20 hp
- displacement
- 58.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Cub CadetCub Cadet 7000
vs
New HollandNew Holland Boomer 1020
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
= Effectively tied700020 hp
Boomer 102020 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
7000 is in the 25th percentile; Boomer 1020 is in the 25th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 7000 higher · +10.4 ci (+18%)700068.6 ci
Boomer 102058.2 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
7000 is in the 31st percentile; Boomer 1020 is in the 17th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied70003
Boomer 10203
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
7000 is in the 50th percentile; Boomer 1020 is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ 7000 higher · +382 lb (+26%)70001,837 lb
Boomer 10201,455 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
7000 is in the 33rd percentile; Boomer 1020 is in the 19th · 711 models
7000 (A)Boomer 1020 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7000 | New Holland Boomer 1020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cub Cadet | New Holland | — |
| Model | 7000 | Boomer 1020 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility, Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7000 | New Holland Boomer 1020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Not recorded | ISM-S753 | — |
| Power Output | 20hp | 20hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ Boomer 1020+500 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 68.6ci | 58.2ci | ▲ 7000+10.4 ci · +18% |
| Bore | 3.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.1in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7000 | New Holland Boomer 1020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partially synchronized | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7000 | New Holland Boomer 1020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 107in | 96.6in | ▲ 7000+10.4 in · +11% |
| Width | 46.3in | 46.4in | ▲ Boomer 1020+0.1 in · <1% |
| Height | 78.9in | 72.4in | ▲ 7000+6.5 in · +9% |
| Operating Weight | 1,837lb | 1,455lb | ▲ 7000+382 lb · +26% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7000 | New Holland Boomer 1020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7000 | New Holland Boomer 1020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7000 | New Holland Boomer 1020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7000 | New Holland Boomer 1020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7000 | New Holland Boomer 1020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.5gal | 1.1gal | ▲ 7000+0.4 gal · +36% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 25th percentile (20 hp)B · 25th percentile (20 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 31st percentile (68.6 ci)B · 17th percentile (58.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 33rd percentile (1,837 lb)B · 19th percentile (1,455 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 41st percentile (107 in)B · 24th percentile (96.6 in)
A · 7000B · Boomer 1020Median Sub-Compact Tractor