Head to head · Sub-Compact

Cub Cadet 7000 vs Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320

Image not recorded
Cub CadetModel A

Cub Cadet 7000

Sub-Compact

power
20 hp
displacement
68.6 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
6
Full 7000 specs
Cub CadetCub Cadet 7000
vs
SteigerSteiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact

n = 584–816

Engine Power

▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320 higher · +300 hp (+1500%)
700020 hp
Turbo Tiger II ST-320320 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp

7000 is in the 25th percentile; Turbo Tiger II ST-320 is in the 99th · 816 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320 higher · +834 ci (+1216%)
700068.6 ci
Turbo Tiger II ST-320903 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci

7000 is in the 31st percentile; Turbo Tiger II ST-320 is in the 99th · 757 models

Cylinders

▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320 higher · +5 (+167%)
70003
Turbo Tiger II ST-3208
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3

7000 is in the 50th percentile; Turbo Tiger II ST-320 is in the 99th · 802 models

Forward Gears

▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320 higher · +4 (+67%)
70006
Turbo Tiger II ST-32010
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9

7000 is in the 18th percentile; Turbo Tiger II ST-320 is in the 62nd · 616 models

7000 (A)Turbo Tiger II ST-320 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCub Cadet 7000Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320Difference
ManufacturerCub CadetSteiger—
Model7000Turbo Tiger II ST-320—
CategorySub-CompactUtility—

Engine

SpecCub Cadet 7000Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320Difference
ManufacturerMitsubishiCummins—
ModelNot recordedVT-903—
Power Output20hp320hp▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320+300 hp · +1500%
Rated RPM2,500RPM2,600RPM▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320+100 RPM · +4%
Cylinders38▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320+5 · +167%
Displacement68.6ci903ci▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320+834 ci · +1216%
Bore3.1in5.5in▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320+2.4 in · +77%
Stroke3.1in4.8in▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320+1.7 in · +55%

Transmission

SpecCub Cadet 7000Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320Difference
TypePartially synchronizedManual—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCub Cadet 7000Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320Difference
Length107in244in▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320+137 in · +128%
Width46.3in96in▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320+49.7 in · +107%
Height78.9in133in▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320+54.1 in · +69%
Operating Weight1,837lb24,000lb▲ Turbo Tiger II ST-320+22,163 lb · +1206%

Hydraulics

SpecCub Cadet 7000Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320Difference
System TypeOpen centerOpen CenterSame
Steering TypePower steeringNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCub Cadet 7000Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320Difference
Hitch CategoryINot recorded—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCub Cadet 7000Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320Difference
Chassis TypeNot recorded4x4 4WD—
Drive TypeNot recorded4WD—
Steering TypePower steeringNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecCub Cadet 7000Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecCub Cadet 7000Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320Difference
Coolant1.5galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecCub Cadet 7000Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320Difference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 26.9 hp
A · 25th percentile (20 hp)B · 99th percentile (320 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 91.4 ci
A · 31st percentile (68.6 ci)B · 99th percentile (903 ci)

Cylinders

median 3
A · 50th percentile (3)B · 99th percentile (8)

Forward Gears

median 9
A · 18th percentile (6)B · 62nd percentile (10)

Operating Weight

median 2,700 lb
A · 33rd percentile (1,837 lb)B · 99th percentile (24,000 lb)
A · 7000B · Turbo Tiger II ST-320Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full spec pageCub Cadet 7000Full spec pageSteiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320