Cub CadetModel A
Cub Cadet 7200
Utility
- power
- 20 hp
- displacement
- 68.6 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Utility
Cub Cadet 7200 vs New Holland T1010
New HollandModel B
New Holland T1010
Utility
- power
- 20 hp
- displacement
- 58.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Cub CadetCub Cadet 7200
vs
New HollandNew Holland T1010
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied720020 hp
T101020 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
7200 is in the 8th percentile; T1010 is in the 8th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 7200 higher · +10.4 ci (+18%)720068.6 ci
T101058.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
7200 is in the 9th percentile; T1010 is in the 5th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied72003
T10103
Median Utility Tractor4
7200 is in the 23rd percentile; T1010 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 7200 higher · +509 lb (+35%)72001,964 lb
T10101,455 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
7200 is in the 12th percentile; T1010 is in the 5th · 5,107 models
7200 (A)T1010 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7200 | New Holland T1010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cub Cadet | New Holland | — |
| Model | 7200 | T1010 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7200 | New Holland T1010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Not recorded | S753 | — |
| Power Output | 20hp | 20hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ T1010+500 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 68.6ci | 58.2ci | ▲ 7200+10.4 ci · +18% |
| Bore | 3.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.1in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7200 | New Holland T1010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partially Synchronized | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7200 | New Holland T1010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 107in | 96.3in | ▲ 7200+10.7 in · +11% |
| Width | 46.3in | 46.4in | ▲ T1010+0.1 in · <1% |
| Height | 78.9in | 72.4in | ▲ 7200+6.5 in · +9% |
| Operating Weight | 1,964lb | 1,455lb | ▲ 7200+509 lb · +35% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7200 | New Holland T1010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power Steering | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7200 | New Holland T1010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three Point Hitch | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7200 | New Holland T1010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power Steering | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7200 | New Holland T1010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7200 | New Holland T1010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7200 | New Holland T1010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 8th percentile (20 hp)B · 8th percentile (20 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 9th percentile (68.6 ci)B · 5th percentile (58.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 12th percentile (1,964 lb)B · 5th percentile (1,455 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 13th percentile (107 in)B · 7th percentile (96.3 in)
A · 7200B · T1010Median Utility Tractor