Cub CadetModel A
Cub Cadet 7260
Sub-Compact
- power
- 26 hp
- displacement
- 80.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Cub Cadet 7260 vs New Holland T1030
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T1030
Utility
- power
- 26 hp
- displacement
- 69 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Cub CadetCub Cadet 7260
vs
New HollandNew Holland T1030
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
= Effectively tied726026 hp
T103026 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
7260 is in the 49th percentile; T1030 is in the 49th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 7260 higher · +11.4 ci (+17%)726080.4 ci
T103069 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
7260 is in the 41st percentile; T1030 is in the 32nd · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied72603
T10303
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
7260 is in the 50th percentile; T1030 is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ 7260 higher · +860 lb (+59%)72602,315 lb
T10301,455 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
7260 is in the 43rd percentile; T1030 is in the 19th · 711 models
7260 (A)T1030 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7260 | New Holland T1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cub Cadet | New Holland | — |
| Model | 7260 | T1030 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility, Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7260 | New Holland T1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Not recorded | S773L | — |
| Power Output | 26hp | 26hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ T1030+400 RPM · +15% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 80.4ci | 69ci | ▲ 7260+11.4 ci · +17% |
| Bore | 3.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.6in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7260 | New Holland T1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | partially synchronized gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7260 | New Holland T1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 115in | 96.3in | ▲ 7260+18.7 in · +19% |
| Width | 51.8in | 46.4in | ▲ 7260+5.4 in · +12% |
| Height | 83.5in | 72.4in | ▲ 7260+11.1 in · +15% |
| Operating Weight | 2,315lb | 1,455lb | ▲ 7260+860 lb · +59% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7260 | New Holland T1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7260 | New Holland T1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tread | 9.5in | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7260 | New Holland T1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7260 | New Holland T1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7260 | New Holland T1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7260 | New Holland T1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.7gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 49th percentile (26 hp)B · 49th percentile (26 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 41st percentile (80.4 ci)B · 32nd percentile (69 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 43rd percentile (2,315 lb)B · 19th percentile (1,455 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 52nd percentile (115 in)B · 24th percentile (96.3 in)
A · 7260B · T1030Median Sub-Compact Tractor