Cub CadetModel A
Cub Cadet 7275
Utility
- power
- 27 hp
- displacement
- 91.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Cub Cadet 7275 vs Ford 5000
Cub CadetCub Cadet 7275
vs
FordFord 5000
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 5000 higher · +42.1 hp (+156%)727527 hp
500069.1 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
7275 is in the 19th percentile; 5000 is in the 62nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 5000 higher · +142 ci (+155%)727591.3 ci
5000233 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
7275 is in the 17th percentile; 5000 is in the 63rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 5000 higher · +1 (+33%)72753
50004
Median Utility Tractor4
7275 is in the 23rd percentile; 5000 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Width
▲ 5000 higher · +14.1 in (+26%)727554 in
500068.1 in
Median Utility Tractor66 in
7275 is in the 25th percentile; 5000 is in the 55th · 3,933 models
7275 (A)5000 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7275 | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cub Cadet | Ford | — |
| Model | 7275 | 5000 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7275 | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Ford | — |
| Model | K3M | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 27hp | 69.1hp | ▲ 5000+42.1 hp · +156% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 7275+400 RPM · +19% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 5000+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 91.3ci | 233ci | ▲ 5000+142 ci · +155% |
| Bore | 3.3in | 4.2in | ▲ 5000+0.9 in · +27% |
| Stroke | 3.5in | 4.2in | ▲ 5000+0.7 in · +20% |
Transmission
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7275 | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Sliding gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7275 | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 115in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 54in | 68.1in | ▲ 5000+14.1 in · +26% |
| Height | 84.3in | 63.4in | ▲ 7275+20.9 in · +33% |
| Operating Weight | 2,685lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7275 | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power assist | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7275 | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7275 | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7275 | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power assist | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Differential mechanical wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7275 | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7275 | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.7gal | 3.8gal | ▲ 5000+2.1 gal · +124% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7275 | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | With ROPS | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 19th percentile (27 hp)B · 62nd percentile (69.1 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 17th percentile (91.3 ci)B · 63rd percentile (233 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Width
median 66 inA · 25th percentile (54 in)B · 55th percentile (68.1 in)
Height
median 94.1 inA · 31st percentile (84.3 in)B · 12th percentile (63.4 in)
A · 7275B · 5000Median Utility Tractor