Head to head · Utility

Cub Cadet Ex3200 vs Mitsubishi MT300

Image not recorded
Cub CadetModel A

Cub Cadet Ex3200

Utility

power
32 hp
displacement
100 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full Ex3200 specs
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B

Mitsubishi MT300

Utility

power
30 hp
displacement
91.3 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
9
Full MT300 specs
Cub CadetCub Cadet Ex3200
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT300

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 3,9335,720

Engine Power

▲ Ex3200 higher · +2 hp (+7%)
Ex320032 hp
MT30030 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

Ex3200 is in the 24th percentile; MT300 is in the 22nd · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Ex3200 higher · +8.7 ci (+10%)
Ex3200100 ci
MT30091.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

Ex3200 is in the 22nd percentile; MT300 is in the 17th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Ex32003
MT3003
Median Utility Tractor4

Ex3200 is in the 23rd percentile; MT300 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ Ex3200 higher · +213 lb (+9%)
Ex32002,550 lb
MT3002,337 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

Ex3200 is in the 17th percentile; MT300 is in the 15th · 5,107 models

Ex3200 (A)MT300 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCub Cadet Ex3200Mitsubishi MT300Difference
ManufacturerCub CadetMitsubishi
ModelEx3200MT300
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecCub Cadet Ex3200Mitsubishi MT300Difference
ManufacturerYanmarMitsubishi
ModelNot recordedK3M
Power Output32hp30hpEx3200+2 hp · +7%
Rated RPM2,600RPM2,700RPMMT300+100 RPM · +4%
Cylinders33Same
Displacement100ci91.3ciEx3200+8.7 ci · +10%
Bore3.5in3.3inEx3200+0.2 in · +6%
Stroke3.5in3.5inSame

Transmission

SpecCub Cadet Ex3200Mitsubishi MT300Difference
TypeHydrostaticSynchromesh

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCub Cadet Ex3200Mitsubishi MT300Difference
Length110in116inMT300+6 in · +5%
Width59.1in55.5inEx3200+3.6 in · +6%
HeightNot recorded56.1in
Operating Weight2,550lb2,337lbEx3200+213 lb · +9%

Hydraulics

SpecCub Cadet Ex3200Mitsubishi MT300Difference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen centerSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Hitch & Towing

SpecCub Cadet Ex3200Mitsubishi MT300Difference
Hitch TypeCategory INot recorded
Hitch Category1III
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded

Chassis & Drive

SpecCub Cadet Ex3200Mitsubishi MT300Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x2 2WD
Drive Type4WD2WD
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Electrical

SpecCub Cadet Ex3200Mitsubishi MT300Difference
Starter TypeNot recordedElectric

Capacities

SpecCub Cadet Ex3200Mitsubishi MT300Difference
Coolant1.2galNot recorded

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 24th percentile (32 hp)B · 22nd percentile (30 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 22nd percentile (100 ci)B · 17th percentile (91.3 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 17th percentile (2,550 lb)B · 15th percentile (2,337 lb)

Length

median 137 in
A · 16th percentile (110 in)B · 21st percentile (116 in)
A · Ex3200B · MT300Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageCub Cadet Ex3200Full spec pageMitsubishi MT300