Image not recorded
Cub CadetModel A
Cub Cadet GT 3200
Lawn and Garden
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 44.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Lawn and Garden
Cub Cadet GT 3200 vs Scotts S2554
ScottsModel B
Scotts S2554
Lawn and Garden
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 44 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Cub CadetCub Cadet GT 3200
vs
ScottsScotts S2554
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Lawn and Garden
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedGT 320025 hp
S255425 hp
Median Lawn and Garden Tractor18 hp
GT 3200 is in the 85th percentile; S2554 is in the 85th · 380 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT 3200 higher · +0.2 ci (<1%)GT 320044.2 ci
S255444 ci
Median Lawn and Garden Tractor41.1 ci
GT 3200 is in the 62nd percentile; S2554 is in the 57th · 366 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT 32002
S25542
Median Lawn and Garden Tractor2
GT 3200 is in the 50th percentile; S2554 is in the 50th · 376 models
Operating Weight
▲ GT 3200 higher · +201 lb (+33%)GT 3200805 lb
S2554604 lb
Median Lawn and Garden Tractor738 lb
GT 3200 is in the 55th percentile; S2554 is in the 38th · 314 models
GT 3200 (A)S2554 (B)Median Lawn and Garden Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cub Cadet GT 3200 | Scotts S2554 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cub Cadet | Scotts | — |
| Model | GT 3200 | S2554 | — |
| Category | Lawn and Garden | Lawn and Garden | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Cub Cadet GT 3200 | Scotts S2554 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Kohler | Kohler | Same |
| Model | Command CH730S | CV25S | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 3,600RPM | 3,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 2 | 2 | Same |
| Displacement | 44.2ci | 44ci | ▲ GT 3200+0.2 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.3in | 3.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 2.6in | 2.6in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Cub Cadet GT 3200 | Scotts S2554 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cub Cadet GT 3200 | Scotts S2554 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 72in | 72in | Same |
| Width | 41.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 43.3in | 45.3in | ▲ S2554+2 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 805lb | 604lb | ▲ GT 3200+201 lb · +33% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cub Cadet GT 3200 | Scotts S2554 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Cub Cadet GT 3200 | Scotts S2554 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent with electric clutch | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Cub Cadet GT 3200 | Scotts S2554 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 16x7.5 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 24x10.5 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cub Cadet GT 3200 | Scotts S2554 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Sleeve hitch (optional) | — |
| Hitch Category | 0 | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cub Cadet GT 3200 | Scotts S2554 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Mechanical Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cub Cadet GT 3200 | Scotts S2554 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Cub Cadet GT 3200 | Scotts S2554 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Open | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 18 hpA · 85th percentile (25 hp)B · 85th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 41.1 ciA · 62nd percentile (44.2 ci)B · 57th percentile (44 ci)
Cylinders
median 2A · 50th percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (2)
Operating Weight
median 738 lbA · 55th percentile (805 lb)B · 38th percentile (604 lb)
Length
median 71.7 inA · 61st percentile (72 in)B · 61st percentile (72 in)
A · GT 3200B · S2554Median Lawn and Garden Tractor