Image not recorded
Cub CadetModel A
Cub Cadet Sx3100
Utility
- power
- 31.2 hp
- displacement
- 100 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Cub Cadet Sx3100 vs Ford 640
Image not recorded
Cub CadetCub Cadet Sx3100
vs
FordFord 640
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Sx3100 higher · +0.2 hp (<1%)Sx310031.2 hp
64031 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Sx3100 is in the 24th percentile; 640 is in the 24th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 640 higher · +34 ci (+34%)Sx3100100 ci
640134 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Sx3100 is in the 22nd percentile; 640 is in the 31st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 640 higher · +1 (+33%)Sx31003
6404
Median Utility Tractor4
Sx3100 is in the 23rd percentile; 640 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 640 higher · +1,001 lb (+49%)Sx31002,030 lb
6403,031 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
Sx3100 is in the 13th percentile; 640 is in the 23rd · 5,107 models
Sx3100 (A)640 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cub Cadet Sx3100 | Ford 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cub Cadet | Ford | — |
| Model | Sx3100 | 640 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Cub Cadet Sx3100 | Ford 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Yanmar | Ford | — |
| Model | Not recorded | EAE Red Tiger | — |
| Power Output | 31.2hp | 31hp | ▲ Sx3100+0.2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ Sx3100+500 RPM · +25% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 640+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 100ci | 134ci | ▲ 640+34 ci · +34% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.4in | ▲ Sx3100+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.5in | 3.6in | ▲ 640+0.1 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Cub Cadet Sx3100 | Ford 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Unsynchronized gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cub Cadet Sx3100 | Ford 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 109in | 121in | ▲ 640+12 in · +11% |
| Width | 51.6in | 64.6in | ▲ 640+13 in · +25% |
| Height | Not recorded | 58.7in | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,030lb | 3,031lb | ▲ 640+1,001 lb · +49% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cub Cadet Sx3100 | Ford 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Cub Cadet Sx3100 | Ford 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Conventional | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cub Cadet Sx3100 | Ford 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type 1 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,250lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cub Cadet Sx3100 | Ford 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Internal expanding shoes operated by two foot pedals | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cub Cadet Sx3100 | Ford 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Cub Cadet Sx3100 | Ford 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 0.5gal | 3.8gal | ▲ 640+3.3 gal · +660% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Cub Cadet Sx3100 | Ford 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open operator station | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 24th percentile (31.2 hp)B · 24th percentile (31 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 22nd percentile (100 ci)B · 31st percentile (134 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 13th percentile (2,030 lb)B · 23rd percentile (3,031 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 15th percentile (109 in)B · 29th percentile (121 in)
A · Sx3100B · 640Median Utility Tractor