Image not recorded
DaedongModel A
Daedong CK35 HST
Sub-Compact
- power
- 34 hp
- displacement
- 101 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Daedong CK35 HST vs McCormick Intl X10.35H
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.35H
Sub-Compact
- power
- 34 hp
- displacement
- 101 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
DaedongDaedong CK35 HST
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.35H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedCK35 HST34 hp
X10.35H34 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
CK35 HST is in the 62nd percentile; X10.35H is in the 62nd · 816 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedCK35 HST101 ci
X10.35H101 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
CK35 HST is in the 58th percentile; X10.35H is in the 58th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCK35 HST3
X10.35H3
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
CK35 HST is in the 50th percentile; X10.35H is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ CK35 HST higher · +149 lb (+5%)CK35 HST3,263 lb
X10.35H3,114 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
CK35 HST is in the 61st percentile; X10.35H is in the 58th · 711 models
CK35 HST (A)X10.35H (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Daedong CK35 HST | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | CK35 HST | X10.35H | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Daedong CK35 HST | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Daedong | Same |
| Model | 3A165LXB | 3A165 | — |
| Power Output | 34hp | 34hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 101ci | 101ci | Same |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.6in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Daedong CK35 HST | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic Drive | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Daedong CK35 HST | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 10.5in | 122in | ▲ X10.35H+112 in · +1062% |
| Width | 55.2in | 54.6in | ▲ CK35 HST+0.6 in · +1% |
| Height | 94.8in | 96.8in | ▲ X10.35H+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 3,263lb | 3,114lb | ▲ CK35 HST+149 lb · +5% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Daedong CK35 HST | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Daedong CK35 HST | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 14-Jul | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 11.2-24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Daedong CK35 HST | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type I | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,764lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Daedong CK35 HST | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Daedong CK35 HST | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Daedong CK35 HST | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 62nd percentile (34 hp)B · 62nd percentile (34 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 58th percentile (101 ci)B · 58th percentile (101 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 61st percentile (3,263 lb)B · 58th percentile (3,114 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 1st percentile (10.5 in)B · 64th percentile (122 in)
A · CK35 HSTB · X10.35HMedian Sub-Compact Tractor