Head to head · Agricultural

David Brown 895 vs McCormick-Deering AW-6

David Brown 895 Tractor
David BrownModel A

David Brown 895

Agricultural

power
Not recorded
displacement
268 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 895 specs
Image not recorded
McCormick-DeeringModel B

McCormick-Deering AW-6

Standard Tread

power
Not recorded
displacement
248 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full AW-6 specs
David BrownDavid Brown 895
vs
McCormick-DeeringMcCormick-Deering AW-6

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 1,083–1,130

Engine Displacement

▲ 895 higher · +20 ci (+8%)
895268 ci
AW-6248 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

895 is in the 36th percentile; AW-6 is in the 29th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
8954
AW-64
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

895 is in the 31st percentile; AW-6 is in the 31st · 1,130 models

895 (A)AW-6 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecDavid Brown 895McCormick-Deering AW-6Difference
ManufacturerDavid BrownMcCormick-Deering—
Model895AW-6—
CategoryAgriculturalStandard Tread—

Engine

SpecDavid Brown 895McCormick-Deering AW-6Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHInternational Harvester—
Cylinders44Same
Displacement268ci248ci▲ 895+20 ci · +8%
BoreNot recorded3.9in—
StrokeNot recorded5.3in—

Hitch & Towing

SpecDavid Brown 895McCormick-Deering AW-6Difference
Hitch CategoryNot recordedCategory 3—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 36th percentile (268 ci)B · 29th percentile (248 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 31st percentile (4)B · 31st percentile (4)
A · 895B · AW-6Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageDavid Brown 895Full spec pageMcCormick-Deering AW-6