Image not recorded
DeutzModel A
Deutz F2L612 4
Sub-Compact
- power
- 21.7 hp
- displacement
- 93.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Deutz F2L612 4 vs John Deere 9RX 640
John DeereModel B
John Deere 9RX 640
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 632 hp
- displacement
- 827 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
DeutzDeutz F2L612 4
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 9RX 640
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ 9RX 640 higher · +610 hp (+2812%)F2L612 421.7 hp
9RX 640632 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
F2L612 4 is in the 31st percentile; 9RX 640 is in the 99th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9RX 640 higher · +734 ci (+788%)F2L612 493.1 ci
9RX 640827 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
F2L612 4 is in the 52nd percentile; 9RX 640 is in the 99th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ 9RX 640 higher · +4 (+200%)F2L612 42
9RX 6406
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
F2L612 4 is in the 11th percentile; 9RX 640 is in the 99th · 802 models
Forward Gears
▲ 9RX 640 higher · +8 (+80%)F2L612 410
9RX 64018
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
F2L612 4 is in the 62nd percentile; 9RX 640 is in the 96th · 616 models
F2L612 4 (A)9RX 640 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Deutz F2L612 4 | John Deere 9RX 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Deutz | John Deere | — |
| Model | F2L612 4 | 9RX 640 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | Deutz F2L612 4 | John Deere 9RX 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Deutz | John Deere | — |
| Model | Not recorded | JD14 | — |
| Power Output | 21.7hp | 632hp | ▲ 9RX 640+610 hp · +2812% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 2 | 6 | ▲ 9RX 640+4 · +200% |
| Displacement | 93.1ci | 827ci | ▲ 9RX 640+734 ci · +788% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 5.2in | ▲ 9RX 640+1.7 in · +49% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 6.5in | ▲ 9RX 640+1.8 in · +38% |
Transmission
| Spec | Deutz F2L612 4 | John Deere 9RX 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Deutz F2L612 4 | John Deere 9RX 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 107in | 346in | ▲ 9RX 640+239 in · +223% |
| Width | 63in | 30in | ▲ F2L612 4+33 in · +110% |
| Height | 60.6in | 146in | ▲ 9RX 640+85.4 in · +141% |
| Operating Weight | 2,954lb | 56,320lb | ▲ 9RX 640+53,366 lb · +1807% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Deutz F2L612 4 | John Deere 9RX 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | closed center pressure/flow compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Deutz F2L612 4 | John Deere 9RX 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | IVN/IV | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Deutz F2L612 4 | John Deere 9RX 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Deutz F2L612 4 | John Deere 9RX 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Deutz F2L612 4 | John Deere 9RX 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 14.9gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Deutz F2L612 4 | John Deere 9RX 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 31st percentile (21.7 hp)B · 99th percentile (632 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 52nd percentile (93.1 ci)B · 99th percentile (827 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 11th percentile (2)B · 99th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 62nd percentile (10)B · 96th percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 56th percentile (2,954 lb)B · 99th percentile (56,320 lb)
A · F2L612 4B · 9RX 640Median Sub-Compact Tractor