Image not recorded
Deutz-FahrModel A
Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200
Agricultural
- power
- 200 hp
- displacement
- 436 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 27
Head to head · Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
How they compare
Agrotron 200 is in the 81st percentile; Argotron L 730 is in the 84th · 1,028 models
Agrotron 200 is in the 75th percentile; Argotron L 730 is in the 77th · 1,083 models
Agrotron 200 is in the 74th percentile; Argotron L 730 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Agrotron 200 is in the 87th percentile; Argotron L 730 is in the 81st · 972 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 | Deutz-Fahr Argotron L 730 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Deutz-Fahr | Deutz-Fahr | Same |
| Model | Agrotron 200 | Argotron L 730 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
| Spec | Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 | Deutz-Fahr Argotron L 730 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Deutz | Deutz | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | TCD 2013 L06 | — |
| Power Output | 200hp | 217hp | ▲ Argotron L 730+17 hp · +9% |
| Rated RPM | 2,350RPM | 2,350RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 436ci | 436ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.1in | 5.1in | Same |
| Spec | Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 | Deutz-Fahr Argotron L 730 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | 12-speed power shift, creeper | — |
| Spec | Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 | Deutz-Fahr Argotron L 730 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 185in | 197in | ▲ Argotron L 730+12 in · +6% |
| Width | Not recorded | 98.4in | — |
| Height | 120in | 119in | ▲ Agrotron 200+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 15,214lb | 18,118lb | ▲ Argotron L 730+2,904 lb · +19% |
| Spec | Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 | Deutz-Fahr Argotron L 730 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 | Deutz-Fahr Argotron L 730 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Category context