Head to head · Utility

Ebro 160D vs White 700

Ebro 160D Tractor
EbroModel A

Ebro 160D

Utility

power
Not recorded
displacement
220 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 160D specs
White 700 Tractor
WhiteModel B

White 700

Utility

power
Not recorded
displacement
223 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
8
Full 700 specs
EbroEbro 160D
vs
WhiteWhite 700

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 5,580–5,720

Engine Displacement

▲ 700 higher · +3 ci (+1%)
160D220 ci
700223 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

160D is in the 60th percentile; 700 is in the 61st · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
160D4
7004
Median Utility Tractor4

160D is in the 50th percentile; 700 is in the 50th · 5,720 models

160D (A)700 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecEbro 160DWhite 700Difference
ManufacturerEbroWhite—
Model160D700—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecEbro 160DWhite 700Difference
ManufacturerPerkinsFiat—
Rated RPMNot recorded2,500RPM—
Cylinders44Same
Displacement220ci223ci▲ 700+3 ci · +1%

Hydraulics

SpecEbro 160DWhite 700Difference
Steering TypeNot recordedHydrostatic power—

Chassis & Drive

SpecEbro 160DWhite 700Difference
Chassis Type4x24x2 2WD—
Drive Type2WD2WDSame
Steering TypeNot recordedHydrostatic power—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 60th percentile (220 ci)B · 61st percentile (223 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
A · 160DB · 700Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageEbro 160DFull spec pageWhite 700