Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ebro 160E vs Fendt 208V
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 208V
Orchard/Vineyard
- power
- 80.5 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
EbroEbro 160E
vs
FendtFendt 208V
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 208V higher · +19.5 hp (+32%)160E61 hp
208V80.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
160E is in the 55th percentile; 208V is in the 71st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 160E higher · +19 ci (+9%)160E220 ci
208V201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
160E is in the 60th percentile; 208V is in the 55th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 160E higher · +1 (+33%)160E4
208V3
Median Utility Tractor4
160E is in the 50th percentile; 208V is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 208V higher · +1,014 lb (+19%)160E5,291 lb
208V6,305 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
160E is in the 50th percentile; 208V is in the 60th · 5,107 models
160E (A)208V (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ebro 160E | Fendt 208V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ebro | Fendt | — |
| Model | 160E | 208V | — |
| Category | Utility | Orchard/Vineyard | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ebro 160E | Fendt 208V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ebro | AGCO Power | — |
| Power Output | 61hp | 80.5hp | ▲ 208V+19.5 hp · +32% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 160E+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 220ci | 201ci | ▲ 160E+19 ci · +9% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.3in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.7in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Ebro 160E | Fendt 208V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ebro 160E | Fendt 208V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 131in | 141in | ▲ 208V+10 in · +8% |
| Width | 79.5in | 45.3in | ▲ 160E+34.2 in · +75% |
| Height | Not recorded | 95in | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,291lb | 6,305lb | ▲ 208V+1,014 lb · +19% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ebro 160E | Fendt 208V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ebro 160E | Fendt 208V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 2 | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ebro 160E | Fendt 208V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ebro 160E | Fendt 208V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ebro 160E | Fendt 208V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 55th percentile (61 hp)B · 71st percentile (80.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 60th percentile (220 ci)B · 55th percentile (201 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,291 lb)B · 60th percentile (6,305 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 42nd percentile (131 in)B · 56th percentile (141 in)
A · 160EB · 208VMedian Utility Tractor