
Head to head · Utility
Ebro 350 vs Massey Ferguson 240S

Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 240S
Utility
- power
- 46 hp
- displacement
- 152 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
EbroEbro 350
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 240S
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 350 higher · +1 hp (+2%)35047 hp
240S46 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
350 is in the 41st percentile; 240S is in the 40th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tied350152 ci
240S152 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
350 is in the 39th percentile; 240S is in the 39th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied3503
240S3
Median Utility Tractor4
350 is in the 23rd percentile; 240S is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied3508
240S8
Median Utility Tractor12
350 is in the 23rd percentile; 240S is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
350 (A)240S (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ebro 350 | Massey Ferguson 240S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ebro | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 350 | 240S | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ebro 350 | Massey Ferguson 240S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Perkins | Same |
| Model | AD3.152 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 47hp | 46hp | ▲ 350+1 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,250RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 152ci | 152ci | Same |
| Bore | 3.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Ebro 350 | Massey Ferguson 240S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ebro 350 | Massey Ferguson 240S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 129in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 72in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 59.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 4,034lb | 4,070lb | ▲ 240S+36 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ebro 350 | Massey Ferguson 240S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ebro 350 | Massey Ferguson 240S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ebro 350 | Massey Ferguson 240S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ebro 350 | Massey Ferguson 240S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ebro 350 | Massey Ferguson 240S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2.9gal | 2.7gal | ▲ 350+0.2 gal · +7% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ebro 350 | Massey Ferguson 240S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 41st percentile (47 hp)B · 40th percentile (46 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 39th percentile (152 ci)B · 39th percentile (152 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 37th percentile (4,034 lb)B · 38th percentile (4,070 lb)
A · 350B · 240SMedian Utility Tractor