
Head to head · Industrial
Empire 88 vs Massey Ferguson 202 Work Bull

Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 202 Work Bull
Industrial
- power
- 40 hp
- displacement
- 134 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 6
EmpireEmpire 88
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 202 Work Bull
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Industrial
Engine Displacement
▲ 88 higher · +1 ci (<1%)88135 ci
202 Work Bull134 ci
Median Industrial Tractor284 ci
88 is in the 16th percentile; 202 Work Bull is in the 14th · 53 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied884
202 Work Bull4
Median Industrial Tractor4
88 is in the 50th percentile; 202 Work Bull is in the 50th · 55 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied886
202 Work Bull6
Median Industrial Tractor5
88 is in the 65th percentile; 202 Work Bull is in the 65th · 43 models
Operating Weight
▲ 202 Work Bull higher · +564 lb (+23%)882,500 lb
202 Work Bull3,064 lb
Median Industrial Tractor9,127 lb
88 is in the 9th percentile; 202 Work Bull is in the 13th · 49 models
88 (A)202 Work Bull (B)Median Industrial Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Empire 88 | Massey Ferguson 202 Work Bull | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Empire | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 88 | 202 Work Bull | — |
| Category | Industrial, Lawn and Garden | Industrial | — |
Engine
| Spec | Empire 88 | Massey Ferguson 202 Work Bull | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Willys | Continental | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Z-134 | — |
| Power Output | 40hp | 40hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,000RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 135ci | 134ci | ▲ 88+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.1in | 3.3in | ▲ 202 Work Bull+0.2 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 3.9in | ▲ 88+0.5 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | Empire 88 | Massey Ferguson 202 Work Bull | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Empire 88 | Massey Ferguson 202 Work Bull | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 118in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 65.7in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 53.1in | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,500lb | 3,064lb | ▲ 202 Work Bull+564 lb · +23% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Empire 88 | Massey Ferguson 202 Work Bull | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Empire 88 | Massey Ferguson 202 Work Bull | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Rear PTO | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Empire 88 | Massey Ferguson 202 Work Bull | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Empire 88 | Massey Ferguson 202 Work Bull | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Mechanical drum | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Empire 88 | Massey Ferguson 202 Work Bull | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Empire 88 | Massey Ferguson 202 Work Bull | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Empire 88 | Massey Ferguson 202 Work Bull | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 284 ciA · 16th percentile (135 ci)B · 14th percentile (134 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 5A · 65th percentile (6)B · 65th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 9,127 lbA · 9th percentile (2,500 lb)B · 13th percentile (3,064 lb)
A · 88B · 202 Work BullMedian Industrial Tractor