Image not recorded
FarmallModel A
Farmall 100
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 123 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Row Crop
Farmall 100 vs Massey-Harris 81
Massey-HarrisModel B
Massey-Harris 81
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 124 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
FarmallFarmall 100
vs
Massey-HarrisMassey-Harris 81
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ 81 higher · +1 ci (<1%)100123 ci
81124 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
100 is in the 2nd percentile; 81 is in the 2nd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied1004
814
Median Row Crop Tractor6
100 is in the 17th percentile; 81 is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied1004
814
Median Row Crop Tractor16
100 is in the 4th percentile; 81 is in the 4th · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ 100 higher · +105 lb (+4%)1003,000 lb
812,895 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
100 is in the 2nd percentile; 81 is in the 2nd · 1,350 models
100 (A)81 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Farmall 100 | Massey-Harris 81 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Farmall | Massey-Harris | — |
| Model | 100 | 81 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Farmall 100 | Massey-Harris 81 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International Harvester | Continental | — |
| Model | C-123 | F124 | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 1,500RPM | ▲ 81+100 RPM · +7% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 123ci | 124ci | ▲ 81+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.1in | 3in | ▲ 100+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 4in | 4.4in | ▲ 81+0.4 in · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | Farmall 100 | Massey-Harris 81 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Unsynchronized gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Farmall 100 | Massey-Harris 81 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 107in | 119in | ▲ 81+12 in · +11% |
| Width | 56in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 65.5in | 58in | ▲ 100+7.5 in · +13% |
| Operating Weight | 3,000lb | 2,895lb | ▲ 100+105 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Farmall 100 | Massey-Harris 81 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Farmall 100 | Massey-Harris 81 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Optional Transmission or Live PTO | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Farmall 100 | Massey-Harris 81 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | IH Fast Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Farmall 100 | Massey-Harris 81 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
| Brake Type | Contracting band | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Farmall 100 | Massey-Harris 81 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Farmall 100 | Massey-Harris 81 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 2.8gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Farmall 100 | Massey-Harris 81 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 2nd percentile (123 ci)B · 2nd percentile (124 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 4th percentile (4)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 2nd percentile (3,000 lb)B · 2nd percentile (2,895 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 1st percentile (107 in)B · 2nd percentile (119 in)
A · 100B · 81Median Row Crop Tractor