Image not recorded
FarmallModel A
Farmall 1066
Row Crop
- power
- 108 hp
- displacement
- 414 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Row Crop
Farmall 1066 vs Farmall 200
Image not recorded
FarmallModel B
Farmall 200
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 123 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
FarmallFarmall 1066
vs
FarmallFarmall 200
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ 1066 higher · +291 ci (+237%)1066414 ci
200123 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
1066 is in the 66th percentile; 200 is in the 2nd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ 1066 higher · +2 (+50%)10666
2004
Median Row Crop Tractor6
1066 is in the 50th percentile; 200 is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1066 higher · +4 (+100%)10668
2004
Median Row Crop Tractor16
1066 is in the 16th percentile; 200 is in the 4th · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1066 higher · +8,609 lb (+243%)106612,150 lb
2003,541 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
1066 is in the 50th percentile; 200 is in the 4th · 1,350 models
1066 (A)200 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Farmall 1066 | Farmall 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Farmall | Farmall | Same |
| Model | 1066 | 200 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Farmall 1066 | Farmall 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International Harvester | International Harvester | Same |
| Model | DT414 | C123 | — |
| Power Output | 108hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 1,400RPM | ▲ 1066+1,000 RPM · +71% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 1066+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 414ci | 123ci | ▲ 1066+291 ci · +237% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 3.1in | ▲ 1066+1.2 in · +39% |
| Stroke | 4.8in | 4in | ▲ 1066+0.8 in · +20% |
Transmission
| Spec | Farmall 1066 | Farmall 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Sliding Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Farmall 1066 | Farmall 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 165in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 98in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 12,150lb | 3,541lb | ▲ 1066+8,609 lb · +243% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Farmall 1066 | Farmall 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Farmall 1066 | Farmall 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Farmall 1066 | Farmall 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 5,600lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Farmall 1066 | Farmall 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Double dry disc, hydrostatic power self-adjusting | Differential Mechanical Dry Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Farmall 1066 | Farmall 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Farmall 1066 | Farmall 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Farmall 1066 | Farmall 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 66th percentile (414 ci)B · 2nd percentile (123 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 16th percentile (8)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 50th percentile (12,150 lb)B · 4th percentile (3,541 lb)
A · 1066B · 200Median Row Crop Tractor