Image not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
Farmall C vs Huber B
Image not recorded
FarmallFarmall C
vs
HuberHuber B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ B higher · +1.1 hp (+5%)C23 hp
B24.1 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
C is in the 2nd percentile; B is in the 2nd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ B higher · +93 ci (+82%)C113 ci
B206 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
C is in the 1st percentile; B is in the 9th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedC4
B4
Median Row Crop Tractor6
C is in the 17th percentile; B is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedC4
B4
Median Row Crop Tractor16
C is in the 4th percentile; B is in the 4th · 1,200 models
C (A)B (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Farmall C | Huber B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Farmall | Huber | — |
| Model | C | B | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Farmall C | Huber B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International Harvester | Buda | — |
| Model | C113 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 23hp | 24.1hp | ▲ B+1.1 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 1,650RPM | 1,300RPM | ▲ C+350 RPM · +27% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 113ci | 206ci | ▲ B+93 ci · +82% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.8in | ▲ B+0.8 in · +27% |
| Stroke | 4in | 4.5in | ▲ B+0.5 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | Farmall C | Huber B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding Gear | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Farmall C | Huber B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 70.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,845lb | 4,650lb | ▲ B+1,805 lb · +63% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Farmall C | Huber B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Farmall C | Huber B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 540 | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Farmall C | Huber B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 5.50 x 16 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 9.00 x 36 | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Farmall C | Huber B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | Not recorded | 13in | — |
| Rear Tread | Not recorded | 50in | — |
| Rear Tread Adjustment | Not recorded | 50 to 74 inches | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Farmall C | Huber B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
| Brake Type | Manual contracting band | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Farmall C | Huber B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Farmall C | Huber B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fuel Capacity | Not recorded | 16gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Farmall C | Huber B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 2nd percentile (23 hp)B · 2nd percentile (24.1 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 1st percentile (113 ci)B · 9th percentile (206 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 4th percentile (4)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 2nd percentile (2,845 lb)B · 7th percentile (4,650 lb)
A · CB · BMedian Row Crop Tractor