Image not recorded
FarmallModel A
Farmall F-235
Sub-Compact
- power
- 26 hp
- displacement
- 123 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Farmall F-235 vs New Holland T1030
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T1030
Utility
- power
- 26 hp
- displacement
- 69 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FarmallFarmall F-235
vs
New HollandNew Holland T1030
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedF-23526 hp
T103026 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
F-235 is in the 49th percentile; T1030 is in the 49th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ F-235 higher · +54 ci (+78%)F-235123 ci
T103069 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
F-235 is in the 70th percentile; T1030 is in the 32nd · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ F-235 higher · +1 (+33%)F-2354
T10303
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
F-235 is in the 90th percentile; T1030 is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ F-235 higher · +2,195 lb (+151%)F-2353,650 lb
T10301,455 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
F-235 is in the 70th percentile; T1030 is in the 19th · 711 models
F-235 (A)T1030 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Farmall F-235 | New Holland T1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Farmall | New Holland | — |
| Model | F-235 | T1030 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility, Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Farmall F-235 | New Holland T1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International Harvester | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Not recorded | S773L | — |
| Power Output | 26hp | 26hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 1,650RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ T1030+1,350 RPM · +82% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ F-235+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 123ci | 69ci | ▲ F-235+54 ci · +78% |
| Bore | 3.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Farmall F-235 | New Holland T1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Farmall F-235 | New Holland T1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 131in | 96.3in | ▲ F-235+34.7 in · +36% |
| Width | Not recorded | 46.4in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 72.4in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,650lb | 1,455lb | ▲ F-235+2,195 lb · +151% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Farmall F-235 | New Holland T1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Farmall F-235 | New Holland T1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 5.00x15 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 10.00x36 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Farmall F-235 | New Holland T1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Farmall F-235 | New Holland T1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Farmall F-235 | New Holland T1030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 49th percentile (26 hp)B · 49th percentile (26 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 70th percentile (123 ci)B · 32nd percentile (69 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 90th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 70th percentile (3,650 lb)B · 19th percentile (1,455 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 81st percentile (131 in)B · 24th percentile (96.3 in)
A · F-235B · T1030Median Sub-Compact Tractor