Image not recorded
FarmallModel A
Farmall Hydro 100
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 436 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
Farmall Hydro 100 vs New Holland 8560
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland 8560
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 456 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
FarmallFarmall Hydro 100
vs
New HollandNew Holland 8560
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ 8560 higher · +20 ci (+5%)Hydro 100436 ci
8560456 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Hydro 100 is in the 75th percentile; 8560 is in the 80th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedHydro 1006
85606
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Hydro 100 is in the 50th percentile; 8560 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ 8560 higher · +256 lb (+2%)Hydro 10012,130 lb
856012,386 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Hydro 100 is in the 49th percentile; 8560 is in the 50th · 1,350 models
Hydro 100 (A)8560 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Farmall Hydro 100 | New Holland 8560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Farmall | New Holland | — |
| Model | Hydro 100 | 8560 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Farmall Hydro 100 | New Holland 8560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International Harvester | New Holland | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Genesis | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ Hydro 100+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 436ci | 456ci | ▲ 8560+20 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.4in | ▲ 8560+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5in | 5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Farmall Hydro 100 | New Holland 8560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | selective gear fixed ratio with partial (6) range operator-controlled powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Farmall Hydro 100 | New Holland 8560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 180in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 84in | — |
| Operating Weight | 12,130lb | 12,386lb | ▲ 8560+256 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Farmall Hydro 100 | New Holland 8560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | closed center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Farmall Hydro 100 | New Holland 8560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | 3-point | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Farmall Hydro 100 | New Holland 8560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Farmall Hydro 100 | New Holland 8560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Farmall Hydro 100 | New Holland 8560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 6.9gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Farmall Hydro 100 | New Holland 8560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 75th percentile (436 ci)B · 80th percentile (456 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 49th percentile (12,130 lb)B · 50th percentile (12,386 lb)
A · Hydro 100B · 8560Median Row Crop Tractor