Image not recorded
FarmallModel A
Farmall Super BMD
Sub-Compact
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 264 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 5
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Farmall Super BMD vs McCormick-Deering O-6
Image not recorded
McCormick-DeeringModel B
McCormick-Deering O-6
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 248 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 5
FarmallFarmall Super BMD
vs
McCormick-DeeringMcCormick-Deering O-6
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Displacement
▲ Super BMD higher · +16 ci (+6%)Super BMD264 ci
O-6248 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
Super BMD is in the 99th percentile; O-6 is in the 98th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedSuper BMD4
O-64
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
Super BMD is in the 90th percentile; O-6 is in the 90th · 802 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedSuper BMD5
O-65
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
Super BMD is in the 4th percentile; O-6 is in the 4th · 616 models
Operating Weight
▲ Super BMD higher · +146 lb (+3%)Super BMD5,456 lb
O-65,310 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
Super BMD is in the 95th percentile; O-6 is in the 94th · 711 models
Super BMD (A)O-6 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Farmall Super BMD | McCormick-Deering O-6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Farmall | McCormick-Deering | — |
| Model | Super BMD | O-6 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Agricultural, Orchard/Vineyard | — |
Engine
| Spec | Farmall Super BMD | McCormick-Deering O-6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International Harvester | International Harvester | Same |
| Rated RPM | 1,450RPM | 1,450RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 264ci | 248ci | ▲ Super BMD+16 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 4in | 3.9in | ▲ Super BMD+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Farmall Super BMD | McCormick-Deering O-6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Farmall Super BMD | McCormick-Deering O-6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 114in | 133in | ▲ O-6+19 in · +17% |
| Width | 96in | 65in | ▲ Super BMD+31 in · +48% |
| Height | 77.6in | 63.5in | ▲ Super BMD+14.1 in · +22% |
| Operating Weight | 5,456lb | 5,310lb | ▲ Super BMD+146 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Farmall Super BMD | McCormick-Deering O-6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Farmall Super BMD | McCormick-Deering O-6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 540 Standard | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Farmall Super BMD | McCormick-Deering O-6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 6.00-16 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 13-26 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Farmall Super BMD | McCormick-Deering O-6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Farmall Super BMD | McCormick-Deering O-6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Farmall Super BMD | McCormick-Deering O-6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Farmall Super BMD | McCormick-Deering O-6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6.7gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 99th percentile (264 ci)B · 98th percentile (248 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 90th percentile (4)B · 90th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 4th percentile (5)B · 4th percentile (5)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 95th percentile (5,456 lb)B · 94th percentile (5,310 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 50th percentile (114 in)B · 85th percentile (133 in)
A · Super BMDB · O-6Median Sub-Compact Tractor