Image not recorded
FarmallModel A
Farmall Super M-TA
Row Crop
- power
- 44.3 hp
- displacement
- 264 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Row Crop
Farmall Super M-TA vs Ford 950
Image not recorded
FarmallFarmall Super M-TA
vs
FordFord 950
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Super M-TA higher · +0.3 hp (<1%)Super M-TA44.3 hp
95044 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Super M-TA is in the 5th percentile; 950 is in the 5th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Super M-TA higher · +92 ci (+53%)Super M-TA264 ci
950172 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Super M-TA is in the 19th percentile; 950 is in the 5th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedSuper M-TA4
9504
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Super M-TA is in the 17th percentile; 950 is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Super M-TA higher · +5 (+100%)Super M-TA10
9505
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Super M-TA is in the 22nd percentile; 950 is in the 7th · 1,200 models
Super M-TA (A)950 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Farmall Super M-TA | Ford 950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Farmall | Ford | — |
| Model | Super M-TA | 950 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Farmall Super M-TA | Ford 950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International Harvester | Ford | — |
| Model | C264 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 44.3hp | 44hp | ▲ Super M-TA+0.3 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 1,450RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 950+750 RPM · +52% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 264ci | 172ci | ▲ Super M-TA+92 ci · +53% |
| Bore | 4in | 3.9in | ▲ Super M-TA+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 3.6in | ▲ Super M-TA+1.6 in · +44% |
Transmission
| Spec | Farmall Super M-TA | Ford 950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-speed power shift | Unsynchronized gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Farmall Super M-TA | Ford 950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 141in | 133in | ▲ Super M-TA+8 in · +6% |
| Width | 84.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 78.7in | 65.8in | ▲ Super M-TA+12.9 in · +20% |
| Operating Weight | 5,600lb | 3,626lb | ▲ Super M-TA+1,974 lb · +54% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Farmall Super M-TA | Ford 950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | IH Lift-All | Open | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Farmall Super M-TA | Ford 950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Farmall Super M-TA | Ford 950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | IH Fast Hitch | Type I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Farmall Super M-TA | Ford 950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical dry disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Farmall Super M-TA | Ford 950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Farmall Super M-TA | Ford 950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6.5gal | 3.8gal | ▲ Super M-TA+2.7 gal · +71% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Farmall Super M-TA | Ford 950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 5th percentile (44.3 hp)B · 5th percentile (44 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 19th percentile (264 ci)B · 5th percentile (172 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 22nd percentile (10)B · 7th percentile (5)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 10th percentile (5,600 lb)B · 4th percentile (3,626 lb)
A · Super M-TAB · 950Median Row Crop Tractor