FarmallModel A
Farmall Super M
Row Crop
- power
- 44.3 hp
- displacement
- 264 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 5
Head to head · Row Crop
Farmall Super M vs Ford 940
Image not recorded
FarmallFarmall Super M
vs
FordFord 940
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Super M higher · +0.3 hp (<1%)Super M44.3 hp
94044 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Super M is in the 5th percentile; 940 is in the 5th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Super M higher · +92 ci (+53%)Super M264 ci
940172 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Super M is in the 19th percentile; 940 is in the 5th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedSuper M4
9404
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Super M is in the 17th percentile; 940 is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Super M higher · +1 (+25%)Super M5
9404
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Super M is in the 7th percentile; 940 is in the 4th · 1,200 models
Super M (A)940 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Farmall Super M | Ford 940 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Farmall | Ford | — |
| Model | Super M | 940 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Farmall Super M | Ford 940 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International Harvester | Ford | — |
| Model | C264 | 2.8L 4-cyl gasoline | — |
| Power Output | 44.3hp | 44hp | ▲ Super M+0.3 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 1,450RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 940+750 RPM · +52% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 264ci | 172ci | ▲ Super M+92 ci · +53% |
| Bore | 4in | 3.9in | ▲ Super M+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 3.6in | ▲ Super M+1.6 in · +44% |
Transmission
| Spec | Farmall Super M | Ford 940 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding Gear | Unsynchronized gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Farmall Super M | Ford 940 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 134in | 133in | ▲ Super M+1 in · <1% |
| Width | 84.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 78.7in | 65.8in | ▲ Super M+12.9 in · +20% |
| Operating Weight | 5,603lb | 3,626lb | ▲ Super M+1,977 lb · +55% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Farmall Super M | Ford 940 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | IH Lift-All | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Farmall Super M | Ford 940 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Farmall Super M | Ford 940 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | IH Lift-All | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Farmall Super M | Ford 940 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
| Brake Type | Differential Mechanical Dry Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Farmall Super M | Ford 940 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Farmall Super M | Ford 940 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6.5gal | 3.8gal | ▲ Super M+2.7 gal · +71% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Farmall Super M | Ford 940 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 5th percentile (44.3 hp)B · 5th percentile (44 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 19th percentile (264 ci)B · 5th percentile (172 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 7th percentile (5)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 11th percentile (5,603 lb)B · 4th percentile (3,626 lb)
A · Super MB · 940Median Row Crop Tractor