Image not recorded
FarmtracModel A
Farmtrac 270DTC
Utility
- power
- 27 hp
- displacement
- 85 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Utility
Utility
How they compare
270DTC is in the 19th percentile; 300DTC is in the 22nd · 5,383 models
270DTC is in the 14th percentile; 300DTC is in the 20th · 5,580 models
270DTC is in the 23rd percentile; 300DTC is in the 50th · 5,720 models
270DTC is in the 23rd percentile; 300DTC is in the 50th · 4,941 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Farmtrac 270DTC | Farmtrac 300DTC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Farmtrac | Farmtrac | Same |
| Model | 270DTC | 300DTC | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
| Spec | Farmtrac 270DTC | Farmtrac 300DTC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | Mitsubishi | — |
| Power Output | 27hp | 30hp | ▲ 300DTC+3 hp · +11% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 300DTC+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 85ci | 91.5ci | ▲ 300DTC+6.5 ci · +8% |
| Spec | Farmtrac 270DTC | Farmtrac 300DTC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Shuttle, Partial Synchromesh | Sync Shuttle | — |
| Spec | Farmtrac 270DTC | Farmtrac 300DTC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 115in | 126in | ▲ 300DTC+11 in · +10% |
| Width | 50in | 66in | ▲ 300DTC+16 in · +32% |
| Height | 93in | 88in | ▲ 270DTC+5 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 2,600lb | 3,050lb | ▲ 300DTC+450 lb · +17% |
| Spec | Farmtrac 270DTC | Farmtrac 300DTC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 8.3-16 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 12.4-24 | — |
| Spec | Farmtrac 270DTC | Farmtrac 300DTC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Spec | Farmtrac 270DTC | Farmtrac 300DTC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Spec | Farmtrac 270DTC | Farmtrac 300DTC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context