Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Fendt 208 vs John Deere 5090M
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 5090M
Utility
- power
- 84.4 hp
- displacement
- 276 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
FendtFendt 208
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 5090M
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 208 higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)20884.5 hp
5090M84.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
208 is in the 74th percentile; 5090M is in the 74th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 5090M higher · +13 ci (+5%)208263 ci
5090M276 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
208 is in the 74th percentile; 5090M is in the 81st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2084
5090M4
Median Utility Tractor4
208 is in the 50th percentile; 5090M is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 208 higher · +5 (+31%)20821
5090M16
Median Utility Tractor12
208 is in the 88th percentile; 5090M is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
208 (A)5090M (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Fendt 208 | John Deere 5090M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fendt | John Deere | — |
| Model | 208 | 5090M | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Fendt 208 | John Deere 5090M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Deutz | John Deere | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 4045PWL | — |
| Power Output | 84.5hp | 84.4hp | ▲ 208+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 208+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 263ci | 276ci | ▲ 5090M+13 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 4in | 4.2in | ▲ 5090M+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5in | ▲ 208+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Fendt 208 | John Deere 5090M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh with shuttle | Power shift, Partially synchronized, Power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Fendt 208 | John Deere 5090M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 146in | 150in | ▲ 5090M+4 in · +3% |
| Width | 77.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 98.4in | 103in | ▲ 5090M+4.6 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 6,834lb | 9,790lb | ▲ 5090M+2,956 lb · +43% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Fendt 208 | John Deere 5090M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Pump Flow Capacity | Not recorded | 19.4gpm | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Fendt 208 | John Deere 5090M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | 540/540E | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Tires
| Spec | Fendt 208 | John Deere 5090M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 320/85R24 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 460/85R30 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Fendt 208 | John Deere 5090M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Fendt 208 | John Deere 5090M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 FWA | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4x4 FWA | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Fendt 208 | John Deere 5090M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 74th percentile (84.5 hp)B · 74th percentile (84.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 74th percentile (263 ci)B · 81st percentile (276 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 88th percentile (21)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 65th percentile (6,834 lb)B · 85th percentile (9,790 lb)
A · 208B · 5090MMedian Utility Tractor