FendtModel A
Fendt 818
Agricultural
- power
- 192 hp
- displacement
- 348 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Fendt 818 vs Hurlimann H-2000 SX
Image not recorded
HurlimannModel B
Hurlimann H-2000 SX
Agricultural
- power
- 195 hp
- displacement
- 366 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
FendtFendt 818
vs
HurlimannHurlimann H-2000 SX
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ H-2000 SX higher · +3 hp (+2%)818192 hp
H-2000 SX195 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
818 is in the 79th percentile; H-2000 SX is in the 80th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ H-2000 SX higher · +18 ci (+5%)818348 ci
H-2000 SX366 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
818 is in the 51st percentile; H-2000 SX is in the 59th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8186
H-2000 SX6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
818 is in the 74th percentile; H-2000 SX is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ H-2000 SX higher · +663 lb (+4%)81814,992 lb
H-2000 SX15,655 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
818 is in the 69th percentile; H-2000 SX is in the 73rd · 971 models
818 (A)H-2000 SX (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Fendt 818 | Hurlimann H-2000 SX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fendt | Hurlimann | — |
| Model | 818 | H-2000 SX | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Fendt 818 | Hurlimann H-2000 SX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | SAME | — |
| Power Output | 192hp | 195hp | ▲ H-2000 SX+3 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,350RPM | ▲ H-2000 SX+250 RPM · +12% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 348ci | 366ci | ▲ H-2000 SX+18 ci · +5% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Fendt 818 | Hurlimann H-2000 SX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Fendt 818 | Hurlimann H-2000 SX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 101in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 120in | 117in | ▲ 818+3 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 14,992lb | 15,655lb | ▲ H-2000 SX+663 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Fendt 818 | Hurlimann H-2000 SX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Fendt 818 | Hurlimann H-2000 SX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Fendt 818 | Hurlimann H-2000 SX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 79th percentile (192 hp)B · 80th percentile (195 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 51st percentile (348 ci)B · 59th percentile (366 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 69th percentile (14,992 lb)B · 73rd percentile (15,655 lb)
Height
median 111 inA · 75th percentile (120 in)B · 68th percentile (117 in)
A · 818B · H-2000 SXMedian Agricultural Tractor