Image not recorded
FendtModel A
Fendt 828
Agricultural
- power
- 260 hp
- displacement
- 370 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Agricultural
Fendt 828 vs Renault Atles 935
Image not recorded
RenaultModel B
Renault Atles 935
Agricultural
- power
- 260 hp
- displacement
- 436 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
FendtFendt 828
vs
RenaultRenault Atles 935
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tied828260 hp
Atles 935260 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
828 is in the 89th percentile; Atles 935 is in the 89th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Atles 935 higher · +66 ci (+18%)828370 ci
Atles 935436 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
828 is in the 61st percentile; Atles 935 is in the 78th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8286
Atles 9356
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
828 is in the 74th percentile; Atles 935 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ Atles 935 higher · +14 (+350%)8284
Atles 93518
Median Agricultural Tractor16
828 is in the 3rd percentile; Atles 935 is in the 68th · 972 models
828 (A)Atles 935 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Fendt 828 | Renault Atles 935 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fendt | Renault | — |
| Model | 828 | Atles 935 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Fendt 828 | Renault Atles 935 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | Deutz | — |
| Model | Not recorded | BF6L1013FC | — |
| Power Output | 260hp | 260hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,800RPM | ▲ 828+300 RPM · +17% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 370ci | 436ci | ▲ Atles 935+66 ci · +18% |
| Bore | 4in | 4.3in | ▲ Atles 935+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 5in | 5.1in | ▲ Atles 935+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Fendt 828 | Renault Atles 935 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable Vario transmission | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Fendt 828 | Renault Atles 935 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 208in | 226in | ▲ Atles 935+18 in · +9% |
| Width | 101in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 128in | — |
| Operating Weight | 20,834lb | 22,667lb | ▲ Atles 935+1,833 lb · +9% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Fendt 828 | Renault Atles 935 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Fendt 828 | Renault Atles 935 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Category 3 | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 11,307lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Fendt 828 | Renault Atles 935 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 89th percentile (260 hp)B · 89th percentile (260 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 61st percentile (370 ci)B · 78th percentile (436 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 3rd percentile (4)B · 68th percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 86th percentile (20,834 lb)B · 89th percentile (22,667 lb)
A · 828B · Atles 935Median Agricultural Tractor