
FendtModel A
Fendt Dieselross F22
Utility
- power
- 22 hp
- displacement
- 134 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Utility

Utility

How they compare
Dieselross F22 is in the 11th percentile; PE is in the 8th · 5,383 models
Dieselross F22 is in the 33rd percentile; PE is in the 31st · 5,580 models
Dieselross F22 is in the 3rd percentile; PE is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Dieselross F22 is in the 4th percentile; PE is in the 3rd · 4,941 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Fendt Dieselross F22 | Renault PE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fendt | Renault | — |
| Model | Dieselross F22 | PE | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Standard Tread | — |
| Spec | Fendt Dieselross F22 | Renault PE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Deutz | Renault | — |
| Model | F2M414 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 22hp | 20hp | ▲ Dieselross F22+2 hp · +10% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 1,700RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 | ▲ PE+2 · +100% |
| Displacement | 134ci | 129ci | ▲ Dieselross F22+5 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3in | ▲ Dieselross F22+0.9 in · +30% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 4.7in | ▲ Dieselross F22+0.8 in · +17% |
| Spec | Fendt Dieselross F22 | Renault PE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
| Spec | Fendt Dieselross F22 | Renault PE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 113in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 65.2in | — |
| Spec | Fendt Dieselross F22 | Renault PE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
| Spec | Fendt Dieselross F22 | Renault PE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 5.25-16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 9.00-24 | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Fendt Dieselross F22 | Renault PE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
| Spec | Fendt Dieselross F22 | Renault PE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Hand-crank | — |
Category context