Image not recorded
FendtModel A
Fendt F365GT
Utility
- power
- 65 hp
- displacement
- 230 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 21
Head to head · Utility
Fendt F365GT vs Massey Ferguson 2606H
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 2606H
Utility
- power
- 65 hp
- displacement
- 158 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
FendtFendt F365GT
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 2606H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedF365GT65 hp
2606H65 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
F365GT is in the 59th percentile; 2606H is in the 59th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ F365GT higher · +72 ci (+46%)F365GT230 ci
2606H158 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
F365GT is in the 63rd percentile; 2606H is in the 42nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ F365GT higher · +1 (+33%)F365GT4
2606H3
Median Utility Tractor4
F365GT is in the 50th percentile; 2606H is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ F365GT higher · +13 (+163%)F365GT21
2606H8
Median Utility Tractor12
F365GT is in the 88th percentile; 2606H is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
F365GT (A)2606H (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Fendt F365GT | Massey Ferguson 2606H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fendt | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | F365GT | 2606H | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Fendt F365GT | Massey Ferguson 2606H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | KHD | Simpson | — |
| Power Output | 65hp | 65hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ F365GT+300 RPM · +15% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ F365GT+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 230ci | 158ci | ▲ F365GT+72 ci · +46% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.7in | ▲ F365GT+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5in | ▲ 2606H+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Fendt F365GT | Massey Ferguson 2606H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Sync shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Fendt F365GT | Massey Ferguson 2606H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 167in | 138in | ▲ F365GT+29 in · +21% |
| Width | Not recorded | 69.9in | — |
| Height | 104in | 93.9in | ▲ F365GT+10.1 in · +11% |
| Operating Weight | 8,290lb | 5,115lb | ▲ F365GT+3,175 lb · +62% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Fendt F365GT | Massey Ferguson 2606H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Fendt F365GT | Massey Ferguson 2606H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Live | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Fendt F365GT | Massey Ferguson 2606H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 2,756lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Fendt F365GT | Massey Ferguson 2606H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Fendt F365GT | Massey Ferguson 2606H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Fendt F365GT | Massey Ferguson 2606H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Two-post folding ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 59th percentile (65 hp)B · 59th percentile (65 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (230 ci)B · 42nd percentile (158 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 88th percentile (21)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 78th percentile (8,290 lb)B · 49th percentile (5,115 lb)
A · F365GTB · 2606HMedian Utility Tractor