FendtModel A
Fendt Favorit 3S
Utility
- power
- 62 hp
- displacement
- 208 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Fendt Favorit 3S vs Lindner Geotrac 63
Image not recorded
LindnerModel B
Lindner Geotrac 63
Utility
- power
- 64 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
FendtFendt Favorit 3S
vs
LindnerLindner Geotrac 63
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Geotrac 63 higher · +2 hp (+3%)Favorit 3S62 hp
Geotrac 6364 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Favorit 3S is in the 56th percentile; Geotrac 63 is in the 57th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Favorit 3S higher · +7 ci (+3%)Favorit 3S208 ci
Geotrac 63201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Favorit 3S is in the 58th percentile; Geotrac 63 is in the 55th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Favorit 3S higher · +1 (+33%)Favorit 3S4
Geotrac 633
Median Utility Tractor4
Favorit 3S is in the 50th percentile; Geotrac 63 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedFavorit 3S16
Geotrac 6316
Median Utility Tractor12
Favorit 3S is in the 73rd percentile; Geotrac 63 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Favorit 3S (A)Geotrac 63 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Fendt Favorit 3S | Lindner Geotrac 63 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fendt | Lindner | — |
| Model | Favorit 3S | Geotrac 63 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Fendt Favorit 3S | Lindner Geotrac 63 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MWM | Perkins | — |
| Model | D208.4 | 1103 | — |
| Power Output | 62hp | 64hp | ▲ Geotrac 63+2 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ Favorit 3S+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ Favorit 3S+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 208ci | 201ci | ▲ Favorit 3S+7 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 4.1in | ▲ Geotrac 63+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5in | ▲ Geotrac 63+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Fendt Favorit 3S | Lindner Geotrac 63 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Fendt Favorit 3S | Lindner Geotrac 63 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 151in | 158in | ▲ Geotrac 63+7 in · +5% |
| Width | 73.6in | 77.6in | ▲ Geotrac 63+4 in · +5% |
| Height | Not recorded | 92.5in | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,107lb | 6,350lb | ▲ Geotrac 63+243 lb · +4% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Fendt Favorit 3S | Lindner Geotrac 63 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Fendt Favorit 3S | Lindner Geotrac 63 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 56th percentile (62 hp)B · 57th percentile (64 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 58th percentile (208 ci)B · 55th percentile (201 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 58th percentile (6,107 lb)B · 60th percentile (6,350 lb)
A · Favorit 3SB · Geotrac 63Median Utility Tractor