Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Fiat 512R vs Massey Ferguson 1759
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 1759
Utility
- power
- 59 hp
- displacement
- 135 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
FiatFiat 512R
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 1759
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied512R59 hp
175959 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
512R is in the 53rd percentile; 1759 is in the 53rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 512R higher · +119 ci (+88%)512R254 ci
1759135 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
512R is in the 72nd percentile; 1759 is in the 33rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied512R4
17594
Median Utility Tractor4
512R is in the 50th percentile; 1759 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1759 higher · +5 (+71%)512R7
175912
Median Utility Tractor12
512R is in the 15th percentile; 1759 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
512R (A)1759 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Fiat 512R | Massey Ferguson 1759 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 512R | 1759 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Fiat 512R | Massey Ferguson 1759 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FIAT | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | Not recorded | K39 | — |
| Power Output | 59hp | 59hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 1,750RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 1759+750 RPM · +43% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 254ci | 135ci | ▲ 512R+119 ci · +88% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.4in | ▲ 512R+0.7 in · +21% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 3.7in | ▲ 512R+1 in · +27% |
Transmission
| Spec | Fiat 512R | Massey Ferguson 1759 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Fiat 512R | Massey Ferguson 1759 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 135in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 71.1in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 93.3in | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,225lb | 4,343lb | ▲ 512R+882 lb · +20% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Fiat 512R | Massey Ferguson 1759 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Fiat 512R | Massey Ferguson 1759 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 3,307lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Fiat 512R | Massey Ferguson 1759 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Internal wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Fiat 512R | Massey Ferguson 1759 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 53rd percentile (59 hp)B · 53rd percentile (59 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 72nd percentile (254 ci)B · 33rd percentile (135 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 15th percentile (7)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,225 lb)B · 41st percentile (4,343 lb)
A · 512RB · 1759Median Utility Tractor