Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1110 vs Hinomoto MB-1100
Image not recorded
HinomotoModel B
Hinomoto MB-1100
Utility
- power
- 13 hp
- displacement
- 43.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 1
- Forward gears
- 6
FordFord 1110
vs
HinomotoHinomoto MB-1100
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied111013 hp
MB-110013 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1110 is in the 1st percentile; MB-1100 is in the 1st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MB-1100 higher · +0.2 ci (<1%)111043.1 ci
MB-110043.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1110 is in the 1st percentile; MB-1100 is in the 1st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 1110 higher · +1 (+100%)11102
MB-11001
Median Utility Tractor4
1110 is in the 3rd percentile; MB-1100 is in the 1st · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1110 higher · +4 (+67%)111010
MB-11006
Median Utility Tractor12
1110 is in the 39th percentile; MB-1100 is in the 11th · 4,941 models
1110 (A)MB-1100 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Hinomoto MB-1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Hinomoto | — |
| Model | 1110 | MB-1100 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Hinomoto MB-1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Toyosha | — |
| Model | LEK757C | TE-110 | — |
| Power Output | 13hp | 13hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,700RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ MB-1100+300 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 1 | ▲ 1110+1 · +100% |
| Displacement | 43.1ci | 43.3ci | ▲ MB-1100+0.2 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.2in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Hinomoto MB-1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear shift | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Hinomoto MB-1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 101in | 72.8in | ▲ 1110+28.2 in · +39% |
| Width | 43.3in | 37.4in | ▲ 1110+5.9 in · +16% |
| Height | 50.4in | 46.1in | ▲ 1110+4.3 in · +9% |
| Operating Weight | 1,283lb | 904lb | ▲ 1110+379 lb · +42% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Hinomoto MB-1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Hinomoto MB-1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, transmission | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Hinomoto MB-1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 881lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Hinomoto MB-1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4x2 2WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical drum brakes | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Hinomoto MB-1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Hinomoto MB-1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 0.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Hinomoto MB-1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open with optional ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 1st percentile (13 hp)B · 1st percentile (13 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 1st percentile (43.1 ci)B · 1st percentile (43.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 1st percentile (1)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 11th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 3rd percentile (1,283 lb)B · 1st percentile (904 lb)
A · 1110B · MB-1100Median Utility Tractor