Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1110 vs Kubota B5200
Image not recorded
KubotaModel B
Kubota B5200
Utility
- power
- 13 hp
- displacement
- 46.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
FordFord 1110
vs
KubotaKubota B5200
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied111013 hp
B520013 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1110 is in the 1st percentile; B5200 is in the 1st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ B5200 higher · +3.4 ci (+8%)111043.1 ci
B520046.5 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1110 is in the 1st percentile; B5200 is in the 2nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ B5200 higher · +1 (+50%)11102
B52003
Median Utility Tractor4
1110 is in the 3rd percentile; B5200 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1110 higher · +4 (+67%)111010
B52006
Median Utility Tractor12
1110 is in the 39th percentile; B5200 is in the 11th · 4,941 models
1110 (A)B5200 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Kubota B5200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Kubota | — |
| Model | 1110 | B5200 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Kubota B5200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Kubota | — |
| Model | LEK757C | D750-LA | — |
| Power Output | 13hp | 13hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,700RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ B5200+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 43.1ci | 46.5ci | ▲ B5200+3.4 ci · +8% |
| Bore | 3in | 2.7in | ▲ 1110+0.3 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 2.8in | ▲ 1110+0.3 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Kubota B5200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear shift | Gear shift with dry single plate clutch | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Kubota B5200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 101in | 100in | ▲ 1110+1 in · +1% |
| Width | 43.3in | 42.5in | ▲ 1110+0.8 in · +2% |
| Height | 50.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,283lb | 1,058lb | ▲ 1110+225 lb · +21% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Kubota B5200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Kubota B5200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, transmission | Transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | 829rpm | ▲ 1110+171 rpm · +21% |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Kubota B5200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 881lb | 1,040lb | ▲ B5200+159 lb · +18% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Kubota B5200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical drum brakes | Dry internal expanding | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Kubota B5200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Kubota B5200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 0.9gal | 0.7gal | ▲ 1110+0.1 gal · +14% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Kubota B5200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open with optional ROPS | Open with ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 1st percentile (13 hp)B · 1st percentile (13 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 1st percentile (43.1 ci)B · 2nd percentile (46.5 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 11th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 3rd percentile (1,283 lb)B · 1st percentile (1,058 lb)
A · 1110B · B5200Median Utility Tractor