Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1120 vs Ford 5610 Mark III
Image not recorded
FordModel B
Ford 5610 Mark III
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 256 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
FordFord 1120
vs
FordFord 5610 Mark III
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 5610 Mark III higher · +202 ci (+378%)112053.6 ci
5610 Mark III256 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1120 is in the 3rd percentile; 5610 Mark III is in the 73rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 5610 Mark III higher · +1 (+33%)11203
5610 Mark III4
Median Utility Tractor4
1120 is in the 23rd percentile; 5610 Mark III is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 5610 Mark III higher · +7 (+78%)11209
5610 Mark III16
Median Utility Tractor12
1120 is in the 35th percentile; 5610 Mark III is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 5610 Mark III higher · +5,942 lb (+444%)11201,338 lb
5610 Mark III7,280 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1120 is in the 4th percentile; 5610 Mark III is in the 69th · 5,107 models
1120 (A)5610 Mark III (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 5610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 1120 | 5610 Mark III | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 5610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Ford | — |
| Model | S723 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 19.7hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,070RPM | ▲ 1120+430 RPM · +21% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 5610 Mark III+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 53.6ci | 256ci | ▲ 5610 Mark III+202 ci · +378% |
| Bore | 2.8in | 4.4in | ▲ 5610 Mark III+1.6 in · +57% |
| Stroke | 2.8in | 4.2in | ▲ 5610 Mark III+1.4 in · +50% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 5610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear type | Dual Power | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 5610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 106in | 145in | ▲ 5610 Mark III+39 in · +37% |
| Width | 40.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 80.1in | 110in | ▲ 5610 Mark III+29.9 in · +37% |
| Operating Weight | 1,338lb | 7,280lb | ▲ 5610 Mark III+5,942 lb · +444% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 5610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center with closed-center valves | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 5610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 5610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-point hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,410lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 5610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Expanding shoe | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 5610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 5610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 0.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 5610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open with two-post ROPS | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 3rd percentile (53.6 ci)B · 73rd percentile (256 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 4th percentile (1,338 lb)B · 69th percentile (7,280 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 13th percentile (106 in)B · 61st percentile (145 in)
A · 1120B · 5610 Mark IIIMedian Utility Tractor