Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1120 vs Ford 6530
Image not recorded
FordModel B
Ford 6530
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 238 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 20
FordFord 1120
vs
FordFord 6530
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 6530 higher · +184 ci (+344%)112053.6 ci
6530238 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1120 is in the 3rd percentile; 6530 is in the 65th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 6530 higher · +1 (+33%)11203
65304
Median Utility Tractor4
1120 is in the 23rd percentile; 6530 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 6530 higher · +11 (+122%)11209
653020
Median Utility Tractor12
1120 is in the 35th percentile; 6530 is in the 86th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 6530 higher · +4,462 lb (+333%)11201,338 lb
65305,800 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1120 is in the 4th percentile; 6530 is in the 55th · 5,107 models
1120 (A)6530 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 6530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 1120 | 6530 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 6530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Fiat | — |
| Model | S723 | 8045.05 | — |
| Power Output | 19.7hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,500RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 6530+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 53.6ci | 238ci | ▲ 6530+184 ci · +344% |
| Bore | 2.8in | 4.1in | ▲ 6530+1.3 in · +46% |
| Stroke | 2.8in | 4.5in | ▲ 6530+1.7 in · +61% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 6530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear type | Partially synchronized / Synchromesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 6530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 106in | 162in | ▲ 6530+56 in · +53% |
| Width | 40.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 80.1in | 109in | ▲ 6530+28.9 in · +36% |
| Operating Weight | 1,338lb | 5,800lb | ▲ 6530+4,462 lb · +333% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 6530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 6530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 6530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-point hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | I | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,410lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 6530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Expanding shoe | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 6530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 6530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 0.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 6530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open with two-post ROPS | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 3rd percentile (53.6 ci)B · 65th percentile (238 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 86th percentile (20)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 4th percentile (1,338 lb)B · 55th percentile (5,800 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 13th percentile (106 in)B · 78th percentile (162 in)
A · 1120B · 6530Median Utility Tractor