Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1120 vs Ford 840
Image not recorded
FordModel B
Ford 840
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 172 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
FordFord 1120
vs
FordFord 840
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 840 higher · +118 ci (+221%)112053.6 ci
840172 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1120 is in the 3rd percentile; 840 is in the 46th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 840 higher · +1 (+33%)11203
8404
Median Utility Tractor4
1120 is in the 23rd percentile; 840 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 840 higher · +3 (+33%)11209
84012
Median Utility Tractor12
1120 is in the 35th percentile; 840 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 840 higher · +2,062 lb (+154%)11201,338 lb
8403,400 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1120 is in the 4th percentile; 840 is in the 28th · 5,107 models
1120 (A)840 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 840 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 1120 | 840 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 840 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Ford | — |
| Model | S723 | 2.8L 4-cyl gasoline | — |
| Power Output | 19.7hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 1120+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 840+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 53.6ci | 172ci | ▲ 840+118 ci · +221% |
| Bore | 2.8in | 3.9in | ▲ 840+1.1 in · +39% |
| Stroke | 2.8in | 3.6in | ▲ 840+0.8 in · +29% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 840 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear type | Unsynchronized gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 840 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 106in | 122in | ▲ 840+16 in · +15% |
| Width | 40.9in | 64.8in | ▲ 840+23.9 in · +58% |
| Height | 80.1in | 59.3in | ▲ 1120+20.8 in · +35% |
| Operating Weight | 1,338lb | 3,400lb | ▲ 840+2,062 lb · +154% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 840 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 840 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 840 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-point hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | I | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,410lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 840 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
| Brake Type | Expanding shoe | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 840 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 840 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 0.9gal | 3.8gal | ▲ 840+2.9 gal · +322% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 840 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open with two-post ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 3rd percentile (53.6 ci)B · 46th percentile (172 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 4th percentile (1,338 lb)B · 28th percentile (3,400 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 13th percentile (106 in)B · 30th percentile (122 in)
A · 1120B · 840Median Utility Tractor