Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1200 vs Ford 1215
Image not recorded
FordModel B
Ford 1215
Utility
- power
- 16 hp
- displacement
- 54 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 1200
vs
FordFord 1215
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied120016 hp
121516 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1200 is in the 4th percentile; 1215 is in the 4th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1215 higher · +4.9 ci (+10%)120049.1 ci
121554 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1200 is in the 2nd percentile; 1215 is in the 4th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 1215 higher · +1 (+50%)12002
12153
Median Utility Tractor4
1200 is in the 3rd percentile; 1215 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1200 higher · +52 lb (+4%)12001,344 lb
12151,292 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1200 is in the 4th percentile; 1215 is in the 3rd · 5,107 models
1200 (A)1215 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 1215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 1200 | 1215 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 1215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Shibaura | Same |
| Model | LEK802D | S723 | — |
| Power Output | 16hp | 16hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,700RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 1200+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ 1215+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 49.1ci | 54ci | ▲ 1215+4.9 ci · +10% |
| Bore | 3.2in | 2.8in | ▲ 1200+0.3 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 2.8in | ▲ 1200+0.3 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 1215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear shift | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 1215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 94.9in | 106in | ▲ 1215+11.1 in · +12% |
| Width | 42.2in | 40.9in | ▲ 1200+1.3 in · +3% |
| Height | 79in | 80.3in | ▲ 1215+1.3 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 1,344lb | 1,292lb | ▲ 1200+52 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 1215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Live | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 1215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, transmission | Rear PTO | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 1215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 4.00-12 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 8.00-16 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 1215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 881lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 1215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical drum | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 1215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 1215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.1gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Ford 1215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 4th percentile (16 hp)B · 4th percentile (16 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 2nd percentile (49.1 ci)B · 4th percentile (54 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 4th percentile (1,344 lb)B · 3rd percentile (1,292 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 6th percentile (94.9 in)B · 13th percentile (106 in)
A · 1200B · 1215Median Utility Tractor